From Directions to Regions: Decomposing Activations in Language Models via Local Geometry
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Activation decomposition methods in language models are tightly coupled to geometric assumptions on how concepts are realized in activation space. Existing approaches search for individual global directions, implicitly assuming linear separability, which overlooks concepts with nonlinear or multi-dimensional structure. In this work, we leverage Mixture of Factor Analyzers (MFA) as a scalable, unsupervised alternative that models the activation space as a collection of Gaussian regions with their local covariance structure. MFA decomposes activations into two compositional geometric objects: the region's centroid in activation space, and the local variation from the centroid. We train large-scale MFAs for Llama-3.1-8B and Gemma-2-2B, and show they capture complex, nonlinear structures in activation space. Moreover, evaluations on localization and steering benchmarks show that MFA outperforms unsupervised baselines, is competitive with supervised localization methods, and often achieves stronger steering performance than sparse autoencoders. Together, our findings position local geometry, expressed through subspaces, as a promising unit of analysis for scalable concept discovery and model control, accounting for complex structures that isolated directions fail to capture.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.
Builds on
44 of 58 references.
References · 44
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
- 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 442
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 381
32 more
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 328
- 2023Emergent Linear Representations in World Models of Self-Supervised Sequence Modelscited by 313
- 2019Visualizing and Measuring the Geometry of BERTcited by 215
- 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 201
- 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoderscited by 199
- 2023Finding Alignments Between Interpretable Causal Variables and Distributed Neural Representationscited by 197
- 2023Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 194
- 2016Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemycited by 165
- 2024The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 151
- 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 148
- 2024Llama Scope: Extracting Millions of Features from Llama-3.1-8B with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 133
- 2021Transformer visualization via dictionary learning: contextualized embedding as a linear superposition of transformer factorscited by 106
- 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Modelscited by 106
- 2020Are Neural Nets Modular? Inspecting Functional Modularity Through Differentiable Weight Maskscited by 97
- 2022The Geometry of Multilingual Language Model Representationscited by 94
- 2024RAVEL: Evaluating Interpretability Methods on Disentangling Language Model Representationscited by 77
- 2025The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMscited by 72
- 2020How do Decisions Emerge across Layers in Neural Models? Interpretation with Differentiable Maskingcited by 63
- 2025Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometrycited by 58
- 2019Does BERT Make Any Sense? Interpretable Word Sense Disambiguation with Contextualized Embeddingscited by 55
- 2025MIB: A Mechanistic Interpretability Benchmarkcited by 49
- 2024Representation Surgery: Theory and Practice of Affine Steeringcited by 47
- 2016Embedding Projector: Interactive Visualization and Interpretation of Embeddingscited by 43
- 2026When Models Manipulate Manifolds: The Geometry of a Counting Taskcited by 43
- 2024Answer, Assemble, Ace: Understanding How LMs Answer Multiple Choice Questionscited by 35
- 2021Sparse Interventions in Language Models with Differentiable Maskingcited by 34
- 2024Evaluating Open-Source Sparse Autoencoders on Disentangling Factual Knowledge in GPT-2 Smallcited by 34
- 2023Discovering Variable Binding Circuitry with Desideratacited by 32
- 2024A polar coordinate system represents syntax in large language modelscited by 24
- 2024Geometric Signatures of Compositionality Across a Language Model's Lifetimecited by 14
- 2025HyperDAS: Towards Automating Mechanistic Interpretability with Hypernetworkscited by 8
- 2025Decomposing Representation Space into Interpretable Subspaces with Unsupervised Learningcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 10.
10 papers.
- 2026Structuring Sparsity: Block-Sparse Featurizers Capture Visual Concept Manifoldscited by 3
- 2026Steering Without Breaking: Mechanistically Informed Interventions for Discrete Diffusion Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026A Geometric View for Understanding Concept Learning and Neuron Interpretation in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 1
- 2026Emergent Causal-Geometric Dynamics Across Depth in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Exemplar Partitioning for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 0
- 2026Size Doesn't Matter: Cosine-Scored Sparse Autoencoderscited by 0
- 2026Laguerre Geometry for Interpreting Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Through the LENS: Local Geometric Decomposition of Vision-Language Model Representationscited by 0
- 2026MAxBench: A Multinomial Concept Recovery Benchmarkcited by 0
- 2026Interference Beyond Geometry in Concept Extractioncited by 0
- 2026Interference Beyond Geometry in Concept Extraction28 Sep 2026
- 2026MAxBench: A Multinomial Concept Recovery Benchmark11 Sep 2026
- 2026Through the LENS: Local Geometric Decomposition of Vision-Language Model Representations1 Aug 2026
- 2026Laguerre Geometry for Interpreting Large Language Models12 Jul 2026
- 2026Structuring Sparsity: Block-Sparse Featurizers Capture Visual Concept Manifolds23 Jun 2026
- 2026Size Doesn't Matter: Cosine-Scored Sparse Autoencoders13 Jun 2026
- 2026A Geometric View for Understanding Concept Learning and Neuron Interpretation in Sparse Autoencoders5 Jun 2026
- 2026Exemplar Partitioning for Mechanistic Interpretability14 May 2026
- 2026Steering Without Breaking: Mechanistically Informed Interventions for Discrete Diffusion Language Models8 May 2026
- 2026Emergent Causal-Geometric Dynamics Across Depth in Large Language Models4 Feb 2026