mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Capturing Polysemanticity with PRISM: A Multi-Concept Feature Description Framework

arXiv 2506.15538 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated interpretability research aims to identify concepts encoded in neural network features to enhance human understanding of model behavior. Within the context of large language models (LLMs) for natural language processing (NLP), current automated neuron-level feature description methods face two key challenges: limited robustness and the assumption that each neuron encodes a single concept (monosemanticity), despite increasing evidence of polysemanticity. This assumption restricts the expressiveness of feature descriptions and limits their ability to capture the full range of behaviors encoded in model internals. To address this, we introduce Polysemantic FeatuRe Identification and Scoring Method (PRISM), a novel framework specifically designed to capture the complexity of features in LLMs. Unlike approaches that assign a single description per neuron, common in many automated interpretability methods in NLP, PRISM produces more nuanced descriptions that account for both monosemantic and polysemantic behavior. We apply PRISM to LLMs and, through extensive benchmarking against existing methods, demonstrate that our approach produces more accurate and faithful feature descriptions, improving both overall description quality (via a description score) and the ability to capture distinct concepts when polysemanticity is present (via a polysemanticity score).

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2025.

Builds on

57 of 86 references.

References · 57

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  5. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  6. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,462
  7. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  8. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
  9. 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
  10. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  11. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
  12. 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 801
38 more
  1. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
  2. 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 723
  3. 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
  4. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
  5. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  6. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  7. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
  8. 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 179
  9. 2020Compositional Explanations of Neuronscited by 172
  10. 2020Unsupervised Domain Clusters in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 160
  11. 2024Llama Scope: Extracting Millions of Features from Llama-3.1-8B with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 143
  12. 2020Higher-Order Explanations of Graph Neural Networks via Relevant Walkscited by 138
  13. 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Modelscited by 113
  14. 2021Inducing Causal Structure for Interpretable Neural Networkscited by 110
  15. 2024Are self-explanations from Large Language Models faithful?cited by 101
  16. 2022XAI for Transformers: Better Explanations through Conservative Propagationcited by 100
  17. 2021An Interpretability Illusion for BERTcited by 97
  18. 2023Can Large Language Models Explain Themselves? A Study of LLM-Generated Self-Explanationscited by 90
  19. 2024Truth is Universal: Robust Detection of Lies in LLMscited by 79
  20. 2024Concept Induction: Analyzing Unstructured Text with High-Level Concepts Using LLooMcited by 78
  21. 2022Polysemanticity and Capacity in Neural Networkscited by 77
  22. 2023Explaining black box text modules in natural language with language modelscited by 62
  23. 2023Goal-Driven Explainable Clustering via Language Descriptionscited by 58
  24. 2023From task structures to world models: What do LLMs know?cited by 46
  25. 2023Rigorously Assessing Natural Language Explanations of Neuronscited by 45
  26. 2025Enhancing Automated Interpretability with Output-Centric Feature Descriptionscited by 41
  27. 2019From Clustering to Cluster Explanations via Neural Networkscited by 34
  28. 2020Building and Interpreting Deep Similarity Modelscited by 34
  29. 2023Labeling Neural Representations with Inverse Recognitioncited by 32
  30. 2020Do Neural Language Models Show Preferences for Syntactic Formalisms?cited by 30
  31. 2025Mechanistic understanding and validation of large AI models with SemanticLenscited by 29
  32. 2024Chain-of-Thought Unfaithfulness as Disguised Accuracycited by 28
  33. 2022Disentangled Explanations of Neural Network Predictions by Finding Relevant Subspacescited by 25
  34. 2024Understanding polysemanticity in neural networks through coding theorycited by 17
  35. 2024CoSy: Evaluating Textual Explanations of Neuronscited by 17
  36. 2023Evaluating statistical language models as pragmatic reasonerscited by 15
  37. 2022DORA: Exploring Outlier Representations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 14
  38. 2024Latent Concept-based Explanation of NLP Modelscited by 13

50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 6.

10 papers.