mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Self-Interpretation from Interpretability Artifacts: Training Lightweight Adapters on Vector-Label Pairs

arXiv 2602.10352 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-interpretation methods prompt language models to describe their own internal states, but remain unreliable due to hyperparameter sensitivity. We show that training lightweight adapters on interpretability artifacts, while keeping the LM entirely frozen, yields reliable self-interpretation across tasks and model families. A scalar affine adapter with just dmodel+1 parameters suffices: trained adapters generate sparse autoencoder feature labels that outperform the training labels themselves (70% vs 50% generation scoring at 70B scale), identify topics with 94% recall@1 versus 1% for untrained baselines, and decode bridge entities in multi-hop reasoning that appear in neither prompt nor response, surfacing implicit reasoning without chain-of-thought. The learned bias vector alone accounts for 85% of improvement, and simpler adapters generalize better than more expressive alternatives. Controlling for model knowledge via prompted descriptions, we find self-interpretation gains outpace capability gains from 7B to 72B parameters. Our results demonstrate that self-interpretation improves with scale, without modifying the model being interpreted.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

Builds on

19 of 40 references.

References · 19

  1. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  2. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  3. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  4. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
  5. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  6. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
  7. 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 705
  8. 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 579
  9. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 381
  10. 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 225
  11. 2024Do Large Language Models Latently Perform Multi-Hop Reasoning?cited by 165
  12. 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Modelscited by 106
7 more
  1. 2026Emergent Introspective Awareness in Large Language Modelscited by 73
  2. 2024SelfIE: Self-Interpretation of Large Language Model Embeddingscited by 63
  3. 2024LatentQA: Teaching LLMs to Decode Activations Into Natural Languagecited by 49
  4. 2025Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation Explainerscited by 41
  5. 2025Training Language Models to Explain Their Own Computationscited by 27
  6. 2025Because we have LLMs, we Can and Should Pursue Agentic Interpretabilitycited by 14
  7. 2025Predictive Concept Decoders: Training Scalable End-to-End Interpretability Assistantscited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Automated Interpretability and Feature Discovery in Language Models with Agents
  2. 2024Small Language Models Need Strong Verifiers to Self-Correct Reasoning
  3. 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Identify Reasoning Features in Language Models?
  4. 2025I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders
  5. 2025Unsupervised decoding of encoded reasoning using language model interpretability
  6. 2025Rank-1 LoRAs Encode Interpretable Reasoning Signals
  7. 2026Unlocking the Black Box of Latent Reasoning: An Interpretability-Guided Approach to Intervention
  8. 2024How Interpretable are Reasoning Explanations from Prompting Large Language Models?