mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Jacobian Sparse Autoencoders: Sparsify Computations, Not Just Activations

arXiv 2502.18147 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 10

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have been successfully used to discover sparse and human-interpretable representations of the latent activations of LLMs. However, we would ultimately like to understand the computations performed by LLMs and not just their representations. The extent to which SAEs can help us understand computations is unclear because they are not designed to "sparsify" computations in any sense, only latent activations. To solve this, we propose Jacobian SAEs (JSAEs), which yield not only sparsity in the input and output activations of a given model component but also sparsity in the computation (formally, the Jacobian) connecting them. With a na"ive implementation, the Jacobians in LLMs would be computationally intractable due to their size. One key technical contribution is thus finding an efficient way of computing Jacobians in this setup. We find that JSAEs extract a relatively large degree of computational sparsity while preserving downstream LLM performance approximately as well as traditional SAEs. We also show that Jacobians are a reasonable proxy for computational sparsity because MLPs are approximately linear when rewritten in the JSAE basis. Lastly, we show that JSAEs achieve a greater degree of computational sparsity on pre-trained LLMs than on the equivalent randomized LLM. This shows that the sparsity of the computational graph appears to be a property that LLMs learn through training, and suggests that JSAEs might be more suitable for understanding learned transformer computations than standard SAEs.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 31 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2025.

Builds on

31 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Automated Interpretability Metrics Do Not Distinguish Trained and Random Transformers29 Jan
  2. 2024Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoders25 Jun
  3. 2024Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary Learning17 May

Other references · 28

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  3. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  4. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
  5. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  6. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  7. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
  8. 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 964
  9. 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 724
  10. 2016Language Modeling with Gated Convolutional Networkscited by 702
  11. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  12. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
16 more
  1. 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 359
  2. 2023Attribution Patching Outperforms Automated Circuit Discoverycited by 209
  3. 2023How does GPT-2 compute greater-than?: Interpreting mathematical abilities in a pre-trained language modelcited by 202
  4. 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 200
  5. 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 160
  6. 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Modelscited by 113
  7. 2024AtP*: An efficient and scalable method for localizing LLM behaviour to componentscited by 111
  8. 2021Transformer visualization via dictionary learning: contextualized embedding as a linear superposition of transformer factorscited by 108
  9. 2024Steering Language Model Refusal with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 95
  10. 2024Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language modelscited by 59
  11. 2025Large Language Models Share Representations of Latent Grammatical Concepts Across Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 59
  12. 2024Quantifying Feature Space Universality Across Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 27
  13. 2024Residual Stream Analysis with Multi-Layer SAEscited by 19
  14. 2019JumpReLU: A Retrofit Defense Strategy for Adversarial Attackscited by 14
  15. 2024Evolution of SAE Features Across Layers in LLMscited by 14
  16. 2024Transformers Use Causal World Models in Maze-Solving Taskscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Improving Robustness In Sparse Autoencoders via Masked Regularization
  2. 2024Features that Make a Difference: Leveraging Gradients for Improved Dictionary Learning
  3. 2025Sparse Autoencoders, Again?
  4. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Features
  5. 2025Beyond Input Activations: Identifying Influential Latents by Gradient Sparse Autoencoders
  6. 2025Mechanistic Interpretability with Sparse Autoencoder Neural Operators
  7. 2025SplInterp: Improving our Understanding and Training of Sparse Autoencoders
  8. 2026Toward Identifiable Sparse Autoencoders