Semantic Regexes: Auto-Interpreting LLM Features with a Structured Language
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated interpretability aims to translate large language model (LLM) features into human understandable descriptions. However, natural language feature descriptions can be vague, inconsistent, and require manual relabeling. In response, we introduce semantic regexes, structured language descriptions of LLM features. By combining primitives that capture linguistic and semantic patterns with modifiers for contextualization, composition, and quantification, semantic regexes produce precise and expressive feature descriptions. Across quantitative benchmarks and qualitative analyses, semantic regexes match the accuracy of natural language while yielding more concise and consistent feature descriptions. Their inherent structure affords new types of analyses, including quantifying feature complexity across layers, scaling automated interpretability from insights into individual features to model-wide patterns. Finally, in user studies, we find that semantic regexes help people build accurate mental models of LLM features.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.
Builds on
24 of 49 references.
References · 24
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 381
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283
- 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 186
12 more
- 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 148
- 2022Natural Language Descriptions of Deep Visual Featurescited by 136
- 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 136
- 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Modelscited by 106
- 2024A Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agentcited by 62
- 2025Interpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoderscited by 54
- 2023Rigorously Assessing Natural Language Explanations of Neuronscited by 44
- 2025Enhancing Automated Interpretability with Output-Centric Feature Descriptionscited by 39
- 2025Dense SAE Latents Are Features, Not Bugscited by 17
- 2025FADE: Why Bad Descriptions Happen to Good Featurescited by 13
- 2025Capturing Polysemanticity with PRISM: A Multi-Concept Feature Description Frameworkcited by 9
- 2024Abstraction Alignment: Comparing Model-Learned and Human-Encoded Conceptual Relationshipscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.