Steering LLMs? Actually, Sparse Autoencoders can outperform simple baselines
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have been seen as a promising avenue for exploring the internals of Large Language Models (LLMs) and for steering model output generation. When AxBench - a model steering benchmark - was introduced in Wu et al. (2025), SAEs did not seem to live up to their original hype due to poor steering performance relative to a set of simple baselines. This work serves as a partial rebuttal for Sparse Autoencoders and suggests that the results of Wu et al. (2025) did not do them full justice. We find that Sparse Autoencoders can, in fact, perform close to on par with the reference LoRA performance on the AxBench benchmark, when features are selected and labelled with our supervised pipeline. We also find that our pipeline selects features that are surprisingly causal of their identified labels when using only its interpretability-based components. Lastly, we present evidence that high sparsity (low l0) may not be crucial for successful steering based on interpretability, which is in contrast to the earlier findings in Wang et al. (2025).
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 26 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.
Builds on
26 of 35 references.
Closest ancestors · 13
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnet28 May
- 2025Does higher interpretability imply better utility? A Pairwise Analysis on Sparse Autoencoders4 Oct
- 2025Sparse-Autoencoder-Guided Internal Representation Unlearning for Large Language Models19 Sep
- 2025SAEs Are Good for Steering -- If You Select the Right Features26 May
- 2025SAIF: A Sparse Autoencoder Framework for Interpreting and Steering Instruction Following of Language Models17 Feb
- 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoders28 Jan
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Features28 Jan
- 2024Llama Scope: Extracting Millions of Features from Llama-3.1-8B with Sparse Autoencoders27 Oct
- 2024Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language models25 Oct
- 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models17 Oct
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders19 Jul
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders6 Jun
Other references · 13
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 334
- 2021An Interpretability Illusion for BERTcited by 97
- 2024Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and Controlcited by 86
- 2022Concept Activation Regions: A Generalized Framework For Concept-Based Explanationscited by 57
- 2024Decoding Dark Matter: Specialized Sparse Autoencoders for Interpreting Rare Concepts in Foundation Modelscited by 16
- 2019JumpReLU: A Retrofit Defense Strategy for Adversarial Attackscited by 14
1 more
- 2019Master your Metrics with Calibrationcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Sampling Reveals Style: Unsupervised, Training-Free Discovery of Prompt-Conditional Stylistic Axes in LLM Activationscited by 1
- 2026SAEScientist-Bench: Can AI Agents Conduct Autonomous SAE Interpretability Research?cited by 0
- 2026Gradients for Interventions and Activations for Detection: Targeted Feature Learning in Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Gradients for Interventions and Activations for Detection: Targeted Feature Learning in Language Models26 Sep 2026
- 2026SAEScientist-Bench: Can AI Agents Conduct Autonomous SAE Interpretability Research?8 Sep 2026
- 2026Sampling Reveals Style: Unsupervised, Training-Free Discovery of Prompt-Conditional Stylistic Axes in LLM Activations20 Jul 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Enhancing LLM Steering through Sparse Autoencoder-Based Vector Refinement
- 2024Can sparse autoencoders be used to decompose and interpret steering vectors?
- 2025SAE-SSV: Supervised Steering in Sparse Representation Spaces for Reliable Control of Language Models
- 2026Pre-Intervention Prediction of Sparse Autoencoder Steering Side Effects
- 2025CorrSteer: Generation-Time LLM Steering via Correlated Sparse Autoencoder Features
- 2026Are Sparse Autoencoder Benchmarks Reliable?
- 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability
- 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing