Interpreting Latent Protein Language Model Features with Geometric Annotations
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Interpreting biomedical and science models
Abstract (arXiv)
Protein language models (pLMs) encode information about protein sequences which enable downstream tasks such as structure prediction, but their internal representations are not well understood. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) provide a promising tool to disentangle latent pLM representations into interpretable features, but existing annotation pipelines largely rely on protein-level annotations derived from database labels and LLM annotations of top activating sequences. Such annotations can overlook the localized residue-level and geometric patterns encoded by sparse features. We introduce an automated and scalable method for interpreting SAE features in ESM-2 by using geometrically inspired features of the protein Cα backbone. Across ESM-2 8M layers, an FDR-controlled discovery analysis shows that local geometry is significantly associated with many SAE features, with varying levels of predictive strength, expanding coverage beyond database and sequence-based methods. In particular, geometry can distinguish SAE features sharing the same database annotation, revealing substructure within known biological labels. A significant portion of SAE features activate on unannotated metagenomic protein sequences enabling us to use our SAE annotations to better understand these sequences. In addition, ablation experiments at the level of contact prediction show that removing found geometric features shifts ESM-2's predicted contact maps in the direction of the descriptor. This provides a robust method of annotating proteins activated within SAE neurons at a residue level, providing a bridge between mechanistic interpretability and structural biology.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Interpreting biomedical and science models, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 12 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.
Builds on
12 of 42 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025ProtSAE: Disentangling and Interpreting Protein Language Models via Semantically-Guided Sparse Autoencoders26 Aug
- 2025Towards Interpretable Protein Structure Prediction with Sparse Autoencoders11 Mar
- 2025Interpreting and Steering Protein Language Models through Sparse Autoencoders13 Feb
- 2024InterPLM: Discovering Interpretable Features in Protein Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders13 Nov
Other references · 8
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 143
- 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Modelscited by 113
- 2023The geometry of hidden representations of large transformer modelscited by 112
- 2020BERTology Meets Biology: Interpreting Attention in Protein Language Modelscited by 85
- 2024Concept Bottleneck Language Models For protein designcited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders for Low-N Protein Function Prediction and Design
- 2025SAE-RNA: A Sparse Autoencoder Model for Interpreting RNA Language Model Representations
- 2026Structural Interpretations of Protein Language Model Representations via Differentiable Graph Partitioning
- 2026Protein Language Models Diverge from Natural Language: Comparative Analysis and Improved Inference
- 2026Learning Latent Protein Languages for Autoregressive Generation
- 2025Structure-Aligned Protein Language Model
- 2026Generative modeling of intrinsically disordered protein regions by reinforcing sparse autoencoder features
- 2026PairSAE: Mechanistic Interpretability from Pair Representations in Protein Co-Folding