mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Measuring and Guiding Monosemanticity

arXiv 2506.19382 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2025cs.CLcited by 10

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications

Abstract (arXiv)

There is growing interest in leveraging mechanistic interpretability and controllability to better understand and influence the internal dynamics of large language models (LLMs). However, current methods face fundamental challenges in reliably localizing and manipulating feature representations. Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have recently emerged as a promising direction for feature extraction at scale, yet they, too, are limited by incomplete feature isolation and unreliable monosemanticity. To systematically quantify these limitations, we introduce Feature Monosemanticity Score (FMS), a novel metric to quantify feature monosemanticity in latent representation. Building on these insights, we propose Guided Sparse Autoencoders (G-SAE), a method that conditions latent representations on labeled concepts during training. We demonstrate that reliable localization and disentanglement of target concepts within the latent space improve interpretability, detection of behavior, and control. Specifically, our evaluations on toxicity detection, writing style identification, and privacy attribute recognition show that G-SAE not only enhances monosemanticity but also enables more effective and fine-grained steering with less quality degradation. Our findings provide actionable guidelines for measuring and advancing mechanistic interpretability and control of LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 41 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2025.

Builds on

41 of 64 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability12 Mar
  2. 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models7 Mar
  3. 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoders28 Jan
  4. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Features28 Jan
  5. 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models17 Oct
  6. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders6 Jun
  7. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep

Other references · 34

  1. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  2. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
  3. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
  4. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  5. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
  6. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
  7. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,255
  8. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
  9. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
  10. 2021StyleCLIP: Text-Driven Manipulation of StyleGAN Imagerycited by 991
  11. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
  12. 2018Towards a Definition of Disentangled Representationscited by 296
22 more
  1. 2023In-context Vectors: Making In Context Learning More Effective and Controllable Through Latent Space Steeringcited by 245
  2. 2022Extracting Latent Steering Vectors from Pretrained Language Modelscited by 225
  3. 2024RedPajama: an Open Dataset for Training Large Language Modelscited by 182
  4. 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 143
  5. 2022Disentangled Representation Learningcited by 112
  6. 2024Faithfulness vs. Plausibility: On the (Un)Reliability of Explanations from Large Language Modelscited by 105
  7. 2023Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Societycited by 92
  8. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of Analysiscited by 88
  9. 2024Safeguarding Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 78
  10. 2025Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometrycited by 61
  11. 2025Interpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoderscited by 60
  12. 2017Shakespearizing Modern Language Using Copy-Enriched Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 57
  13. 2024Controllable Text Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 57
  14. 2023Controlled Text Generation via Language Model Arithmeticcited by 51
  15. 2024From Tokens to Words: On the Inner Lexicon of LLMscited by 48
  16. 2023PREADD: Prefix-Adaptive Decoding for Controlled Text Generationcited by 29
  17. 2022Engineering Monosemanticity in Toy Modelscited by 13
  18. 2024Encourage or Inhibit Monosemanticity? Revisit Monosemanticity from a Feature Decorrelation Perspectivecited by 10
  19. 2022Revision Transformers: Instructing Language Models to Change their Valuescited by 8
  20. 2025LF-Steering: Latent Feature Activation Steering for Enhancing Semantic Consistency in Large Language Modelscited by 8
  21. 2023Learning from Emergence: A Study on Proactively Inhibiting the Monosemantic Neurons of Artificial Neural Networkscited by 5
  22. 2024Symbolic Disentangled Representations for Imagescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 9.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Rethinking Evaluation of Sparse Autoencoders through the Representation of Polysemous Words
  2. 2025Sparse Autoencoder Features for Classifications and Transferability
  3. 2025Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders for Monosemantic Representation
  4. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnet
  5. 2026Sparse Autoencoders for Mechanistic Interpretability in NLP: A Critical Survey of Recoverability, Interpretability, and Utility
  6. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Can Capture Language-Specific Concepts Across Diverse Languages
  7. 2025Measuring Sparse Autoencoder Feature Sensitivity
  8. 2025On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedy