mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discovery

arXiv 2407.14499 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 91

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have recently been proposed to address the 'black-box' problem of deep neural networks, by first mapping images to a human-understandable concept space and then linearly combining concepts for classification. Such models typically require first coming up with a set of concepts relevant to the task and then aligning the representations of a feature extractor to map to these concepts. However, even with powerful foundational feature extractors like CLIP, there are no guarantees that the specified concepts are detectable. In this work, we leverage recent advances in mechanistic interpretability and propose a novel CBM approach -- called Discover-then-Name-CBM (DN-CBM) -- that inverts the typical paradigm: instead of pre-selecting concepts based on the downstream classification task, we use sparse autoencoders to first discover concepts learnt by the model, and then name them and train linear probes for classification. Our concept extraction strategy is efficient, since it is agnostic to the downstream task, and uses concepts already known to the model. We perform a comprehensive evaluation across multiple datasets and CLIP architectures and show that our method yields semantically meaningful concepts, assigns appropriate names to them that make them easy to interpret, and yields performant and interpretable CBMs. Code available at https://github.com/neuroexplicit-saar/discover-then-name.

Key facts. Cited by 91 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2024.

Builds on

53 of 71 references.

References · 53

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  6. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  7. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  8. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  9. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  10. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  11. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  12. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
38 more
  1. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  2. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  3. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  4. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  5. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
  6. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
  7. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
  8. 2022Visual Classification via Description from Large Language Modelscited by 331
  9. 2022Language in a Bottle: Language Model Guided Concept Bottlenecks for Interpretable Image Classificationcited by 310
  10. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
  11. 2022Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 289
  12. 2023Label-Free Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 282
  13. 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
  14. 2016Generating Visual Explanationscited by 156
  15. 2021ZeroCap: Zero-Shot Image-to-Text Generation for Visual-Semantic Arithmeticcited by 150
  16. 2022CLIP-Dissect: Automatic Description of Neuron Representations in Deep Vision Networkscited by 144
  17. 2022From Attribution Maps to Human-Understandable Explanations through Concept Relevance Propagationcited by 141
  18. 2022Natural Language Descriptions of Deep Visual Featurescited by 136
  19. 2020Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectorscited by 119
  20. 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 116
  21. 2021Do Concept Bottleneck Models Learn as Intended?cited by 114
  22. 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 108
  23. 2023Probabilistic Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 101
  24. 2023Waffling around for Performance: Visual Classification with Random Words and Broad Conceptscited by 100
  25. 2022B-cos Networks: Alignment is All We Need for Interpretabilitycited by 88
  26. 2022Concept Bottleneck Model with Additional Unsupervised Conceptscited by 79
  27. 2022Interactive Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 79
  28. 2023Text-To-Concept (and Back) via Cross-Model Alignmentcited by 63
  29. 2022Post hoc Explanations may be Ineffective for Detecting Unknown Spurious Correlationcited by 59
  30. 2022Overlooked factors in concept-based explanations: Dataset choice, concept learnability, and human capabilitycited by 46
  31. 2022On Guiding Visual Attention with Language Specificationcited by 30
  32. 2023Disentangling Neuron Representations with Concept Vectorscited by 28
  33. 2023Sparse Linear Concept Discovery Modelscited by 22
  34. 2023Studying How to Efficiently and Effectively Guide Models with Explanationscited by 16
  35. 2023CLIP-QDA: An Explainable Concept Bottleneck Modelcited by 13
  36. 2023Cross-Modal Conceptualization in Bottleneck Modelscited by 12
  37. 2023Interpreting and Controlling Vision Foundation Models via Text Explanationscited by 11
  38. 2023DeViL: Decoding Vision features into Languagecited by 10

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 47; 2026: 37.

91 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Towards Interpreting Visual Information Processing in Vision-Language Modelscited by 115
  2. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Modelscited by 70
  3. 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptationcited by 66
  4. 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignmentcited by 62
  5. 2025Interpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoderscited by 54
  6. 2024Concept Bottleneck Large Language Modelscited by 41
  7. 2025A Survey on Mechanistic Interpretability for Multi-Modal Foundation Modelscited by 34
  8. 2025Steering CLIP's vision transformer with sparse autoencoderscited by 33
  9. 2025Language Guided Concept Bottleneck Models for Interpretable Continual Learningcited by 28
  10. 2025Interpretable and Testable Vision Features via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 24
  11. 2024DCBM: Data-Efficient Visual Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 16
  12. 2025TIDE : Temporal-Aware Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable Diffusion Transformers in Image Generationcited by 16
38 more
  1. 2024Concept Bottleneck Language Models For protein designcited by 15
  2. 2025If Concept Bottlenecks are the Question, are Foundation Models the Answer?cited by 15
  3. 2024B-cosification: Transforming Deep Neural Networks to be Inherently Interpretablecited by 12
  4. 2025Show and Tell: Visually Explainable Deep Neural Nets via Spatially-Aware Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 12
  5. 2025Discovering and Steering Interpretable Concepts in Large Generative Music Modelscited by 11
  6. 2025Object Centric Concept Bottleneckscited by 10
  7. 2025V2C-CBM: Building Concept Bottlenecks with Vision-to-Concept Tokenizercited by 9
  8. 2025When and How Does CLIP Enable Domain and Compositional Generalization?cited by 9
  9. 2025Probing the Representational Power of Sparse Autoencoders in Vision Modelscited by 9
  10. 2026Cross-Modal Redundancy and the Geometry of Vision-Language Embeddingscited by 9
  11. 2025Label-free Concept Based Multiple Instance Learning for Gigapixel Histopathologycited by 8
  12. 2025SAEmnesia: Erasing Concepts in Diffusion Models with Supervised Sparse Autoencoderscited by 8
  13. 2025SUB: Benchmarking CBM Generalization via Synthetic Attribute Substitutionscited by 6
  14. 2025Interpretable and Steerable Concept Bottleneck Sparse Autoencoderscited by 6
  15. 2025ConceptScope: Characterizing Dataset Bias via Disentangled Visual Conceptscited by 5
  16. 2025Partially Shared Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 5
  17. 2024Towards scientific discovery with dictionary learning: Extracting biological concepts from microscopy foundation modelscited by 4
  18. 2025Zero-shot Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 4
  19. 2025From What to How: Attributing CLIP's Latent Components Reveals Unexpected Semantic Reliancecited by 4
  20. 2025Person-Centric Annotations of LAION-400M: Auditing Bias and Its Transfer to Modelscited by 4
  21. 2026Learning Concept Bottleneck Models from Mechanistic Explanationscited by 4
  22. 2025Ensembling Sparse Autoencoderscited by 3
  23. 2025Sparse Autoencoders are Topic Modelscited by 3
  24. 2025A Geometric Unification of Concept Learning with Concept Conescited by 3
  25. 2026Hierarchical Concept-based Interpretable Modelscited by 3
  26. 2026Inside the Visual Mind: Neuroscience-Motivated Concept Circuits for Interpreting and Steering Vision Transformerscited by 3
  27. 2025Prototype-Based Multiple Instance Learning for Gigapixel Whole Slide Image Classificationcited by 2
  28. 2025Mammo-SAE: Interpreting Breast Cancer Concept Learning with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 2
  29. 2025Reading Images Like Texts: Sequential Image Understanding in Vision-Language Modelscited by 2
  30. 2025Debugging Concept Bottleneck Models through Removal and Retrainingcited by 2
  31. 2025MedSAE: Dissecting MedCLIP Representations with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 2
  32. 2026Decomposing multimodal embedding spaces with group-sparse autoencoderscited by 2
  33. 2026Rethinking Concept Bottleneck Models: From Pitfalls to Solutionscited by 2
  34. 2026Explaining CLIP Zero-shot Predictions Through Conceptscited by 2
  35. 2026Evaluating the Interpretability of Sparse Autoencoders with Concept Annotationscited by 2
  36. 2025CLIP-Free, Label Free, Unsupervised Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1
  37. 2025Beyond Patches: Mining Interpretable Part-Prototypes for Explainable AIcited by 1
  38. 2025PCBEAR: Pose Concept Bottleneck for Explainable Action Recognitioncited by 1

50 most cited of 91 All 91 (JSON)