mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interpretable and Testable Vision Features via Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv 2502.06755 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2025cs.CVcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To truly understand vision models, we must not only interpret their learned features but also validate these interpretations through controlled experiments. While earlier work offers either rich semantics or direct control, few post-hoc tools supply both in a single, model-agnostic procedure. We use sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to bridge this gap; each sparse feature comes with real-image exemplars that reveal its meaning and a decoding vector that can be manipulated to probe its influence on downstream task behavior. By applying our method to widely-used pre-trained vision models, we reveal meaningful differences in the semantic abstractions learned by different pre-training objectives. We then show that a single SAE trained on frozen ViT activations supports patch-level causal edits across tasks (classification and segmentation) all without retraining the ViT or task heads. These qualitative, falsifiable demonstrations position SAEs as a practical bridge between concept discovery and causal probing of vision models. We provide code, demos and models on our project website: https://osu-nlp-group.github.io/saev.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2025.

Builds on

44 of 67 references.

References · 44

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  4. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  7. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  8. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  9. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  10. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  11. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  12. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
32 more
  1. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  2. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  3. 2024Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMscited by 822
  4. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
  5. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 719
  6. 2024DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understandingcited by 718
  7. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
  8. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
  9. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
  10. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  11. 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 312
  12. 2022Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 289
  13. 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
  14. 2024Eagle: Exploring The Design Space for Multimodal LLMs with Mixture of Encoderscited by 137
  15. 2022Natural Language Descriptions of Deep Visual Featurescited by 136
  16. 2021Deformable ProtoPNet: An Interpretable Image Classifier Using Deformable Prototypescited by 120
  17. 2021Transformer visualization via dictionary learning: contextualized embedding as a linear superposition of transformer factorscited by 106
  18. 2017Interpreting Deep Visual Representations via Network Dissectioncited by 103
  19. 2023From CLIP to DINO: Visual Encoders Shout in Multi-modal Large Language Modelscited by 96
  20. 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
  21. 2022What do Vision Transformers Learn? A Visual Explorationcited by 75
  22. 2025Eagle 2: Building Post-Training Data Strategies from Scratch for Frontier Vision-Language Modelscited by 69
  23. 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptationcited by 66
  24. 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignmentcited by 62
  25. 2017SPINE: SParse Interpretable Neural Embeddingscited by 55
  26. 2020This Looks Like That, Because ... Explaining Prototypes for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 50
  27. 2024Explain via Any Concept: Concept Bottleneck Model with Open Vocabulary Conceptscited by 20
  28. 2024Concept Bottleneck Models Without Predefined Conceptscited by 17
  29. 2023A Simple Interpretable Transformer for Fine-Grained Image Classification and Analysiscited by 15
  30. 2019Word Embedding Visualization Via Dictionary Learningcited by 11
  31. 2024This Looks Better than That: Better Interpretable Models with ProtoPNeXtcited by 10
  32. 2021Using Causal Analysis for Conceptual Deep Learning Explanationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 15; 2026: 9.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Modelscited by 70
  2. 2026Not All Features Are Created Equal: A Mechanistic Study of Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 14
  3. 2025CytoSAE: Interpretable Cell Embeddings for Hematologycited by 8
  4. 2025Interpretable and Steerable Concept Bottleneck Sparse Autoencoderscited by 6
  5. 2025Analyzing Hierarchical Structure in Vision Models with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 5
  6. 2025Causal Interpretation of Sparse Autoencoder Features in Visioncited by 4
  7. 2025Mind the (Data) Gap: Evaluating Vision Systems in Small Data Applicationscited by 3
  8. 2025Sparse Autoencoders, Again?cited by 3
  9. 2025Interpreting CFD Surrogates through Sparse Autoencoderscited by 3
  10. 2025Insights into a radiology-specialised multimodal large language model with sparse autoencoderscited by 2
  11. 2025Improving Video Diffusion Transformer Training by Multi-Feature Fusion and Alignment from Self-Supervised Vision Encoderscited by 2
  12. 2025Explaining How Visual, Textual and Multimodal Encoders Share Conceptscited by 1
12 more
  1. 2026GeoSAE: Geometric Prior-Guided Layer-Wise Sparse Autoencoder Annotation of Brain MRI Foundation Modelscited by 1
  2. 2025Evaluating Vision Language Models (VLMs) for Radiology: A Comprehensive Analysiscited by 0
  3. 2025Representational Difference Explanationscited by 0
  4. 2025Pulling Back the Curtain on Deep Networkscited by 0
  5. 2025Correlates of Image Memorability in Vision Encoders: Activations, Attention Entropy, Patch Uniformity and Autoencoder Lossescited by 0
  6. 2026Interpreting Video Representations with Spatio-Temporal Sparse Autoencoderscited by 0
  7. 2026Transcoders Trace Visual Grounding and Hallucinations in Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
  8. 2026A Mechanistic Analysis of Adversarial Fine-tuning of Vision Transformerscited by 0
  9. 2026Analyzing Visual Aircraft Representations with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 0
  10. 2026When Confidence Lacks Concepts: Interpretable OOD Detection via Representation Perturbationscited by 0
  11. 2026EXPOSE: Explainable and Domain-Robust Embeddings from Pathology Vision Foundation Models using Sparse Autoencoderscited by 0
  12. 2026Verifying the Linear Representation Hypothesis: How Interpretable Are Vision SAEs?cited by 0