Decomposing multimodal embedding spaces with group-sparse autoencoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Linear Representation Hypothesis asserts that the embeddings learned by neural networks can be understood as linear combinations of features corresponding to high-level concepts. Based on this ansatz, sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have recently become a popular method for decomposing embeddings into a sparse combination of linear directions, which have been shown empirically to often correspond to human-interpretable semantics. However, recent attempts to apply SAEs to multimodal embedding spaces (such as the popular CLIP embeddings for image/text data) have found that SAEs often learn "split dictionaries", where most of the learned sparse features are essentially unimodal, active only for data of a single modality. In this work, we study how to effectively adapt SAEs for the setting of multimodal embeddings while ensuring multimodal alignment. We first argue that the existence of a split dictionary decomposition on an aligned embedding space implies the existence of a non-split dictionary with improved modality alignment. Then, we propose a new SAE-based approach to multimodal embedding decomposition using cross-modal random masking and group-sparse regularization. We apply our method to popular embeddings for image/text (CLIP) and audio/text (CLAP) data and show that, compared to standard SAEs, our approach learns a more multimodal dictionary while reducing the number of dead neurons and improving feature semanticity. We finally demonstrate how this improvement in alignment of concepts between modalities can enable improvements in the interpretability and control of cross-modal tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2026.
Builds on
26 of 44 references.
References · 26
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2022Large-scale Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining with Feature Fusion and Keyword-to-Caption Augmentationcited by 707
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
- 2020Unsupervised Discovery of Interpretable Directions in the GAN Latent Spacecited by 288
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283
14 more
- 2017Neural Audio Synthesis of Musical Notes with WaveNet Autoencoderscited by 222
- 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoderscited by 126
- 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 116
- 2023Mustango: Toward Controllable Text-to-Music Generationcited by 100
- 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Modelscited by 70
- 2025Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Modelscited by 67
- 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignmentcited by 62
- 2025Interpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoderscited by 54
- 2025From Flat to Hierarchical: Extracting Sparse Representations with Matching Pursuitcited by 45
- 2025Interpreting the linear structure of vision-language model embedding spacescited by 32
- 2024Towards Unifying Interpretability and Control: Evaluation via Interventioncited by 28
- 2025JamendoMaxCaps: A Large Scale Music-caption Dataset with Imputed Metadatacited by 14
- 2025Beyond Cross-Modal Alignment: Measuring and Leveraging Modality Gap in Vision-Language Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.