SAE-Xplainers: Rule-Based Feature Interpretation for Extreme Earth Events
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The emergence of large-scale Weather and Climate (W&C) datasets offers new opportunities for modeling extreme Earth events (ExEE) and their impacts using deep learning. However, their adoption in operational settings remains limited by the lack of models' interpretability. While for conventional text and image modalities, tools such as Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have proven effective for extracting human-understandable concepts, their use for the analysis of ExEE remains challenging due to the nature of W&C data. To address this, we introduce (i) a geographic location-based modulation of the inputs of SAE to capture the local semantic meaning of environmental patterns, and (ii) an ensemble of rule-based SAE-Xplainers to interpret the resulting high-dimensional features derived from complex, multi-modal environmental predictors. We evaluate our method on three ExEE types: the prediction of fires, and the detection of tropical cyclones and atmospheric rivers. We show that SAE input modulation improves both reconstruction performance and feature utilization, and that our SAE-Xplainers enable faithful interpretation of complex climatic patterns by unfolding them into human-understandable rules that are consistent with the scientific literature, while also supporting the identification of feature absorption.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2026.
Builds on
22 of 50 references.
References · 22
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
- 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 175
- 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 148
- 2015Interpretable classifiers using rules and Bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction modelcited by 140
- 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
10 more
- 2025Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Modelscited by 67
- 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptationcited by 66
- 2016Scalable Bayesian Rule Listscited by 64
- 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignmentcited by 62
- 2022Learning to Estimate Shapley Values with Vision Transformerscited by 44
- 2021Scalable Rule-Based Representation Learning for Interpretable Classificationcited by 40
- 2019Global Aggregations of Local Explanations for Black Box modelscited by 30
- 2025Uncovering Conceptual Blindspots in Generative Image Models Using Sparse Autoencoderscited by 7
- 2024Multi-Scale Grouped Prototypes for Interpretable Semantic Segmentationcited by 4
- 2024Tackling the Accuracy-Interpretability Trade-off in a Hierarchy of Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Extreme Heatwavescited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.