Features Emerge as Discrete States: The First Application of SAEs to 3D Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) are a powerful dictionary learning technique for decomposing neural network activations, translating the hidden state into human ideas with high semantic value despite no external intervention or guidance. However, this technique has rarely been applied outside of the textual domain, limiting theoretical explorations of feature decomposition. We present the first application of SAEs to the 3D domain, analyzing the features used by a state-of-the-art 3D reconstruction VAE applied to 53k 3D models from the Objaverse dataset. We observe that the network encodes discrete rather than continuous features, leading to our key finding: such models approximate a discrete state space, driven by phase-like transitions from feature activations. Through this state transition framework, we address three otherwise unintuitive behaviors - the inclination of the reconstruction model towards positional encoding representations, the sigmoidal behavior of reconstruction loss from feature ablation, and the bimodality in the distribution of phase transition points. This final observation suggests the model redistributes the interference caused by superposition to prioritize the saliency of different features. Our work not only compiles and explains unexpected phenomena regarding feature decomposition, but also provides a framework to explain the model's feature learning dynamics. The code and dataset of encoded 3D objects will be available on release.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2025.
Builds on
21 of 29 references.
References · 21
- 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,384
- 2022Objaverse: A Universe of Annotated 3D Objectscited by 1,522
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
- 2022LION: Latent Point Diffusion Models for 3D Shape Generationcited by 552
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 412
- 2023Function Vectors in Large Language Modelscited by 292
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283
- 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
- 2020Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectorscited by 119
9 more
- 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 108
- 2024Dora: Sampling and Benchmarking for 3D Shape Variational Auto-Encoderscited by 93
- 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
- 2025Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Modelscited by 67
- 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignmentcited by 62
- 2024Mathematical Models of Computation in Superpositioncited by 34
- 2024Emergence of Hidden Capabilities: Exploring Learning Dynamics in Concept Spacecited by 33
- 2025Interpreting and Steering Protein Language Models through Sparse Autoencoderscited by 16
- 2025Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Superpositioncited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.