mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cross-Modal Conceptualization in Bottleneck Models

arXiv 2310.14805 ↗First posted 23 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) assume that training examples (e.g., x-ray images) are annotated with high-level concepts (e.g., types of abnormalities), and perform classification by first predicting the concepts, followed by predicting the label relying on these concepts. The main difficulty in using CBMs comes from having to choose concepts that are predictive of the label and then having to label training examples with these concepts. In our approach, we adopt a more moderate assumption and instead use text descriptions (e.g., radiology reports), accompanying the images in training, to guide the induction of concepts. Our cross-modal approach treats concepts as discrete latent variables and promotes concepts that (1) are predictive of the label, and (2) can be predicted reliably from both the image and text. Through experiments conducted on datasets ranging from synthetic datasets (e.g., synthetic images with generated descriptions) to realistic medical imaging datasets, we demonstrate that cross-modal learning encourages the induction of interpretable concepts while also facilitating disentanglement. Our results also suggest that this guidance leads to increased robustness by suppressing the reliance on shortcut features.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2023.

Builds on

27 of 37 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  6. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
  7. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  8. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  9. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  10. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  11. 2020Object-Centric Learning with Slot Attentioncited by 876
  12. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 856
15 more
  1. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
  2. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 530
  3. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  4. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  5. 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 376
  6. 2022Language in a Bottle: Language Model Guided Concept Bottlenecks for Interpretable Image Classificationcited by 312
  7. 2020Causal Mediation Analysis for Interpreting Neural NLP: The Case of Gender Biascited by 191
  8. 2018Large Scale Fine-Grained Categorization and Domain-Specific Transfer Learningcited by 174
  9. 2019Adaptively Sparse Transformerscited by 155
  10. 2021Promises and Pitfalls of Black-Box Concept Learning Modelscited by 131
  11. 2019Interpretable Neural Predictions with Differentiable Binary Variablescited by 126
  12. 2021Do Concept Bottleneck Models Learn as Intended?cited by 116
  13. 2021Neuron-level Interpretation of Deep NLP Models: A Surveycited by 81
  14. 2023A Closer Look at the Intervention Procedure of Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 64
  15. 2023Learning to Intervene on Concept Bottleneckscited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

12 papers.