mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cross-Modal Redundancy and the Geometry of Vision-Language Embeddings

arXiv 2602.06218 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 9

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) align images and text with remarkable success, yet the geometry of their shared embedding space remains poorly understood. To probe this geometry, we begin from the Iso-Energy Assumption, which exploits cross-modal redundancy: a concept that is truly shared should exhibit the same average energy across modalities. We operationalize this assumption with an Aligned Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) that encourages energy consistency during training while preserving reconstruction. We find that this inductive bias changes the SAE solution without harming reconstruction, giving us a representation that serves as a tool for geometric analysis. Sanity checks on controlled data with known ground truth confirm that alignment improves when Iso-Energy holds and remains neutral when it does not. Applied to foundational VLMs, our framework reveals a clear structure with practical consequences: (i) sparse bimodal atoms carry the entire cross-modal alignment signal; (ii) unimodal atoms act as modality-specific biases and fully explain the modality gap; (iii) removing unimodal atoms collapses the gap without harming performance; (iv) restricting vector arithmetic to the bimodal subspace yields in-distribution edits and improved retrieval. These findings suggest that the right inductive bias can both preserve model fidelity and render the latent geometry interpretable and actionable.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 60 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.

Builds on

60 of 78 references.

References · 60

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  5. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  6. 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
  7. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,544
  8. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  9. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
  10. 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,127
  11. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  12. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
38 more
  1. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  2. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  3. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
  4. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
  5. 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilitiescited by 679
  6. 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
  7. 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
  8. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
  9. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  10. 2025SmolVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Affordable and Efficient Roboticscited by 507
  11. 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 494
  12. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283
  13. 2016Unsupervised Feature Extraction by Time-Contrastive Learning and Nonlinear ICAcited by 270
  14. 2022OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 267
  15. 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
  16. 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 189
  17. 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
  18. 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoderscited by 126
  19. 2023Vision Language Models in Autonomous Driving: A Survey and Outlookcited by 124
  20. 2020Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectorscited by 119
  21. 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 116
  22. 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 108
  23. 2024Multimodal Autoregressive Pre-training of Large Vision Encoderscited by 108
  24. 2021HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanationscited by 105
  25. 2021What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methodscited by 98
  26. 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
  27. 2021The effectiveness of feature attribution methods and its correlation with automatic evaluation scorescited by 87
  28. 2019The Incomplete Rosetta Stone Problem: Identifiability Results for Multi-View Nonlinear ICAcited by 86
  29. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Modelscited by 70
  30. 2025Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Modelscited by 67
  31. 2021Look at the Variance! Efficient Black-box Explanations with Sobol-based Sensitivity Analysiscited by 65
  32. 2023Diagnosing and Rectifying Vision Models using Languagecited by 58
  33. 2025Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometrycited by 58
  34. 2024Two Effects, One Trigger: On the Modality Gap, Object Bias, and Information Imbalance in Contrastive Vision-Language Modelscited by 55
  35. 2023Understanding and Constructing Latent Modality Structures in Multi-modal Representation Learningcited by 53
  36. 2014Sparse Modeling for Image and Vision Processingcited by 48
  37. 2023Rosetta Neurons: Mining the Common Units in a Model Zoocited by 46
  38. 2025From Flat to Hierarchical: Extracting Sparse Representations with Matching Pursuitcited by 45

50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Geometry of Compromise: Unlocking Generative Capabilities via Controllable Modality Alignment
  2. 2026One Geometry, Different Outcomes: Readout-Dependent Effects of the Modality Gap in Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025Escaping Plato's Cave: JAM for Aligning Independently Trained Vision and Language Models
  4. 2025Beyond Cross-Modal Alignment: Measuring and Leveraging Modality Gap in Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025Same Content, Different Answers: Cross-Modal Inconsistency in MLLMs
  6. 2026Measuring Cross-Modal Synergy: A Benchmark for VLM Explainability
  7. 2026Hyperdimensional Cross-Modal Alignment of Frozen Language and Image Models for Efficient Image Captioning
  8. 2024Deciphering Cross-Modal Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models with Modality Integration Rate