Cross-Modal Redundancy and the Geometry of Vision-Language Embeddings
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-language models (VLMs) align images and text with remarkable success, yet the geometry of their shared embedding space remains poorly understood. To probe this geometry, we begin from the Iso-Energy Assumption, which exploits cross-modal redundancy: a concept that is truly shared should exhibit the same average energy across modalities. We operationalize this assumption with an Aligned Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) that encourages energy consistency during training while preserving reconstruction. We find that this inductive bias changes the SAE solution without harming reconstruction, giving us a representation that serves as a tool for geometric analysis. Sanity checks on controlled data with known ground truth confirm that alignment improves when Iso-Energy holds and remains neutral when it does not. Applied to foundational VLMs, our framework reveals a clear structure with practical consequences: (i) sparse bimodal atoms carry the entire cross-modal alignment signal; (ii) unimodal atoms act as modality-specific biases and fully explain the modality gap; (iii) removing unimodal atoms collapses the gap without harming performance; (iv) restricting vector arithmetic to the bimodal subspace yields in-distribution edits and improved retrieval. These findings suggest that the right inductive bias can both preserve model fidelity and render the latent geometry interpretable and actionable.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 60 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.
Builds on
60 of 78 references.
References · 60
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
- 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,544
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
- 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,127
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
38 more
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
- 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilitiescited by 679
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
- 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
- 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
- 2025SmolVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Affordable and Efficient Roboticscited by 507
- 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 494
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283
- 2016Unsupervised Feature Extraction by Time-Contrastive Learning and Nonlinear ICAcited by 270
- 2022OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 267
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
- 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 189
- 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
- 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoderscited by 126
- 2023Vision Language Models in Autonomous Driving: A Survey and Outlookcited by 124
- 2020Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectorscited by 119
- 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 116
- 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 108
- 2024Multimodal Autoregressive Pre-training of Large Vision Encoderscited by 108
- 2021HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanationscited by 105
- 2021What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methodscited by 98
- 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
- 2021The effectiveness of feature attribution methods and its correlation with automatic evaluation scorescited by 87
- 2019The Incomplete Rosetta Stone Problem: Identifiability Results for Multi-View Nonlinear ICAcited by 86
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Modelscited by 70
- 2025Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Modelscited by 67
- 2021Look at the Variance! Efficient Black-box Explanations with Sobol-based Sensitivity Analysiscited by 65
- 2023Diagnosing and Rectifying Vision Models using Languagecited by 58
- 2025Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometrycited by 58
- 2024Two Effects, One Trigger: On the Modality Gap, Object Bias, and Information Imbalance in Contrastive Vision-Language Modelscited by 55
- 2023Understanding and Constructing Latent Modality Structures in Multi-modal Representation Learningcited by 53
- 2014Sparse Modeling for Image and Vision Processingcited by 48
- 2023Rosetta Neurons: Mining the Common Units in a Model Zoocited by 46
- 2025From Flat to Hierarchical: Extracting Sparse Representations with Matching Pursuitcited by 45
50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.
9 papers.
- 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?cited by 25
- 2026Out of Sight, Still in Mind: Token Compression for Omni-LLMscited by 2
- 2026When Language Overwrites Vision: Over-Alignment and Geometric Debiasing in Vision-Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026A Unifying Framework for Concept-Based Representational Similaritycited by 1
- 2026Same Concept, Different Directions: Cross-Modal Feature Heterogeneity in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 0
- 2026The Hyperspherical Geometry of CLIP Latent Space: A Semantic Mixture Modelcited by 0
- 2026Decoder-Preserving Sparse Autoencoders: Which Readouts Survive Sparse Compression?cited by 0
- 2026Linguistic Context Recodes Visual Representations in Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026From Interpretability Methods to Interpretable Modelscited by 0
- 2026From Interpretability Methods to Interpretable Models4 Sep 2026
- 2026Out of Sight, Still in Mind: Token Compression for Omni-LLMs23 Jul 2026
- 2026Linguistic Context Recodes Visual Representations in Vision-Language Models21 Jul 2026
- 2026Decoder-Preserving Sparse Autoencoders: Which Readouts Survive Sparse Compression?19 Jul 2026
- 2026The Hyperspherical Geometry of CLIP Latent Space: A Semantic Mixture Model15 Jul 2026
- 2026Same Concept, Different Directions: Cross-Modal Feature Heterogeneity in Sparse Autoencoders29 Jun 2026
- 2026A Unifying Framework for Concept-Based Representational Similarity8 Jun 2026
- 2026When Language Overwrites Vision: Over-Alignment and Geometric Debiasing in Vision-Language Models7 May 2026
- 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?30 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026The Geometry of Compromise: Unlocking Generative Capabilities via Controllable Modality Alignment
- 2026One Geometry, Different Outcomes: Readout-Dependent Effects of the Modality Gap in Vision-Language Models
- 2025Escaping Plato's Cave: JAM for Aligning Independently Trained Vision and Language Models
- 2025Beyond Cross-Modal Alignment: Measuring and Leveraging Modality Gap in Vision-Language Models
- 2025Same Content, Different Answers: Cross-Modal Inconsistency in MLLMs
- 2026Measuring Cross-Modal Synergy: A Benchmark for VLM Explainability
- 2026Hyperdimensional Cross-Modal Alignment of Frozen Language and Image Models for Efficient Image Captioning
- 2024Deciphering Cross-Modal Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models with Modality Integration Rate