From What to How: Attributing CLIP's Latent Components Reveals Unexpected Semantic Reliance
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Interpreting vision and multimodal models
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformer-based CLIP models are widely used for text-image probing and feature extraction, making it relevant to understand the internal mechanisms behind their predictions. While recent works show that Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) yield interpretable latent components, they focus on what these encode and miss how they drive predictions. We introduce a scalable framework that reveals what latent components activate for, how they align with expected semantics, and how important they are to predictions. To achieve this, we adapt attribution patching for instance-wise component attributions in CLIP and highlight key faithfulness limitations of the widely used Logit Lens technique. By combining attributions with semantic alignment scores, we can automatically uncover reliance on components that encode semantically unexpected or spurious concepts. Applied across multiple CLIP variants, our method uncovers hundreds of surprising components linked to polysemous words, compound nouns, visual typography and dataset artifacts. While text embeddings remain prone to semantic ambiguity, they are more robust to spurious correlations compared to linear classifiers trained on image embeddings. A case study on skin lesion detection highlights how such classifiers can amplify hidden shortcuts, underscoring the need for holistic, mechanistic interpretability. We provide code at https://github.com/maxdreyer/attributing-clip.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Interpreting vision and multimodal models, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 41 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2025.
Builds on
41 of 55 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Steering CLIP's vision transformer with sparse autoencoders11 Apr
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Models3 Apr
- 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignment6 Feb
- 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptation6 Dec
Other references · 37
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
- 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,711
- 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,555
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 644
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
- 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 613
25 more
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2017Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 549
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
- 2023Data Filtering Networkscited by 250
- 2019BCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wildcited by 225
- 2023Attribution Patching Outperforms Automated Circuit Discoverycited by 209
- 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 196
- 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 178
- 2020A Patient-Centric Dataset of Images and Metadata for Identifying Melanomas Using Clinical Contextcited by 146
- 2022From Attribution Maps to Human-Understandable Explanations through Concept Relevance Propagationcited by 141
- 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 119
- 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 109
- 2023MobileCLIP: Fast Image-Text Models through Multi-Modal Reinforced Trainingcited by 96
- 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
- 2022Spurious Features Everywhere -- Large-Scale Detection of Harmful Spurious Features in ImageNetcited by 41
- 2024A Sober Look at the Robustness of CLIPs to Spurious Featurescited by 38
- 2024Interpreting the Second-Order Effects of Neurons in CLIPcited by 36
- 2022Do Vision-Language Pretrained Models Learn Composable Primitive Concepts?cited by 31
- 2025Mechanistic understanding and validation of large AI models with SemanticLenscited by 29
- 2022Navigating Neural Space: Revisiting Concept Activation Vectors to Overcome Directional Divergencecited by 25
- 2025From Colors to Classes: Emergence of Concepts in Vision Transformerscited by 23
- 2023Understanding the (Extra-)Ordinary: Validating Deep Model Decisions with Prototypical Concept-based Explanationscited by 22
- 2024WWW: A Unified Framework for Explaining What, Where and Why of Neural Networks by Interpretation of Neuron Conceptscited by 14
- 2024A Textbook Remedy for Domain Shifts: Knowledge Priors for Medical Image Analysiscited by 14
- 2024Do Vision-Language Models Understand Compound Nouns?cited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
6 papers.
- 2026Locate, Steer, and Improve: A Practical Survey of Actionable Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Modelscited by 27
- 2025Model Science: getting serious about verification, explanation and control of AI systemscited by 3
- 2026ELROND: Exploring and decomposing intrinsic capabilities of diffusion modelscited by 2
- 2026From Attribution to Action: A Human-Centered Application of Activation Steeringcited by 0
- 2026Towards Robustness against Typographic Attack with Training-free Concept Localizationcited by 0
- 2026Cross-Modal Latent Influence: Patch-Level Training Sample Attribution for Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Cross-Modal Latent Influence: Patch-Level Training Sample Attribution for Vision-Language Models9 Oct 2026
- 2026Towards Robustness against Typographic Attack with Training-free Concept Localization2 Jul 2026
- 2026From Attribution to Action: A Human-Centered Application of Activation Steering13 Apr 2026
- 2026ELROND: Exploring and decomposing intrinsic capabilities of diffusion models10 Feb 2026
- 2026Locate, Steer, and Improve: A Practical Survey of Actionable Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Models20 Jan 2026
- 2025Model Science: getting serious about verification, explanation and control of AI systems27 Aug 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026CLIP Is Shortsighted: Paying Attention Beyond the First Sentence
- 2023Visual Explanations of Image-Text Representations via Multi-Modal Information Bottleneck Attribution
- 2026Sparse CLIP: Co-Optimizing Interpretability and Performance in Contrastive Learning
- 2023Parts of Speech-Grounded Subspaces in Vision-Language Models
- 2026What CLIP Knows but Cannot Say: Recovering Negation from Frozen Intermediate Features
- 2026ORCA: Hunting Compositional Failures in Text-to-Image Diffusion
- 2026From Weights to Concepts: Data-Free Interpretability of CLIP via Singular Vector Decomposition
- 2026Beyond Semantics: Disentangling Information Scope in Sparse Autoencoders for CLIP