mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

J-Miner: Recovering the Decision Logic of Fine-Tuned LLM Classifiers as Compact Rules

arXiv 2608.17063 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Task-fine-tuned large language model (LLM) classifiers acquire task-specific decision knowledge, but this knowledge remains implicit in distributed internal computations, making their decision logic difficult to interpret. We introduce the Executable Decision Compression (EDC) framework and propose J-Miner, which mines vocabulary-named variables from internal readouts and learns rules shared across inputs to produce executable explanations. Analysis reveals that a small set of these variables captures much of the classifier's decision behavior, holding for both varying parameter scales within a family and distinct families. Across six binary tasks, a rule using just one variable reproduces 76.7% of source-classifier decisions on average, rising to 88.8% with 16 variables. Most of the decision information retained by these variables comes from internal activations beyond literal surface matching. A lightweight text reader predicts the variable states, allowing the same fixed rules to execute independently of the source classifier.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.

Builds on

33 of 42 references.

References · 33

  1. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  2. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  3. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  4. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  5. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  6. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
  7. 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 737
  8. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
  9. 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
  10. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
  11. 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 422
  12. 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 417
21 more
  1. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 407
  2. 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 404
  3. 2018Snips Voice Platform: an embedded Spoken Language Understanding system for private-by-design voice interfacescited by 377
  4. 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 316
  5. 2022Language in a Bottle: Language Model Guided Concept Bottlenecks for Interpretable Image Classificationcited by 312
  6. 2023Label-Free Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 285
  7. 2017Distilling a Neural Network Into a Soft Decision Treecited by 236
  8. 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 214
  9. 2020HateBERT: Retraining BERT for Abusive Language Detection in Englishcited by 207
  10. 2021Promises and Pitfalls of Black-Box Concept Learning Modelscited by 131
  11. 2021Do Concept Bottleneck Models Learn as Intended?cited by 116
  12. 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
  13. 2026Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Modelscited by 75
  14. 2017Interpreting Blackbox Models via Model Extractioncited by 44
  15. 2024Concept Bottleneck Large Language Modelscited by 43
  16. 2019Sarcasm Detection using Hybrid Neural Networkcited by 23
  17. 2023Interpretable-by-Design Text Understanding with Iteratively Generated Concept Bottleneckcited by 22
  18. 2025Distilling Knowledge from Large Language Models: A Concept Bottleneck Model for Hate and Counter Speech Recognitioncited by 5
  19. 2025Unveiling Decision-Making in LLMs for Text Classification : Extraction of influential and interpretable concepts with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 3
  20. 2026Neuron-Anchored Rule Extraction for Large Language Models via Contrastive Hierarchical Ablationcited by 2
  21. 2025NEUROLOGIC: From Neural Representations to Interpretable Logic Rulescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.