mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AI Outperforms Humans in Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment via LLM-Based Interviews and Semantic Feature Extraction

arXiv 2605.14761 ↗First posted 14 May 2026cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurately predicting individual aesthetic evaluation for images is a fundamental challenge for AI. Various deep learning (DL)-based models have been proposed for this task, training on image evaluation data to extract objective low-level features. However, aesthetic preferences are inherently subjective and individual-dependent. Accurate prediction thus requires the extraction of high-level semantic features of images and the active collection of preference information from the target individual. To address this issue, we focus on the utility of Large Language Models (LLMs) pretrained on vast amounts of textual data, and develop an integrated DL-LLM system. The system actively elicits aesthetic preferences through LLM-based semi-structured interviews and predicts aesthetic evaluation by leveraging both low-level and high-level features. In our experiments, we compare the proposed system against conventional systems, human predictors, and the target individual's own re-evaluations after a certain time interval. Our results show that the proposed system outperforms all of them, with particularly strong performance on highly-rated images. Moreover, the prediction error of the proposed system is smaller than within-person variability, while human predictors show the largest error, likely due to the influence of their own aesthetic values. These results suggest that AI may be better positioned than others or one's future self to capture individual aesthetic preferences at a given point. This opens a new question of whether AI could serve as a deeper interpreter of human aesthetic sensibility than humans themselves.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.

Builds on

11 of 29 references.

References · 11

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  3. 2023Large Language Models for Automated Data Science: Introducing CAAFE for Context-Aware Automated Feature Engineeringcited by 127
  4. 2016Photo Aesthetics Ranking Network with Attributes and Content Adaptationcited by 125
  5. 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
  6. 2023VILA: Learning Image Aesthetics from User Comments with Vision-Language Pretrainingcited by 65
  7. 2022Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment with Rich Attributescited by 58
  8. 2016Image Aesthetic Assessment: An Experimental Surveycited by 50
  9. 2022Understanding Aesthetics with Language: A Photo Critique Dataset for Aesthetic Assessmentcited by 15
  10. 2025User Experience with LLM-powered Conversational Recommendation Systems: A Case of Music Recommendationcited by 6
  11. 2026Enhancing Zero-shot Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment with Profile-aware Multimodal LLMcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.