FaCT: Faithful Concept Traces for Explaining Neural Network Decisions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep networks have shown remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks, yet getting a global concept-level understanding of how they function remains a key challenge. Many post-hoc concept-based approaches have been introduced to understand their workings, yet they are not always faithful to the model. Further, they make restrictive assumptions on the concepts a model learns, such as class-specificity, small spatial extent, or alignment to human expectations. In this work, we put emphasis on the faithfulness of such concept-based explanations and propose a new model with model-inherent mechanistic concept-explanations. Our concepts are shared across classes and, from any layer, their contribution to the logit and their input-visualization can be faithfully traced. We also leverage foundation models to propose a new concept-consistency metric, C2-Score, that can be used to evaluate concept-based methods. We show that, compared to prior work, our concepts are quantitatively more consistent and users find our concepts to be more interpretable, all while retaining competitive ImageNet performance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 65 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2025.
Builds on
65 of 81 references.
References · 65
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2025DINOv3cited by 1,297
38 more
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
- 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
- 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
- 2021Deep ViT Features as Dense Visual Descriptorscited by 327
- 2023A Tale of Two Features: Stable Diffusion Complements DINO for Zero-Shot Semantic Correspondencecited by 297
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
- 2022Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 289
- 2023Label-Free Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 282
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
- 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
- 2022CLIP-Dissect: Automatic Description of Neuron Representations in Deep Vision Networkscited by 144
- 2022From Attribution Maps to Human-Understandable Explanations through Concept Relevance Propagationcited by 141
- 2021Deformable ProtoPNet: An Interpretable Image Classifier Using Deformable Prototypescited by 120
- 2021Do Concept Bottleneck Models Learn as Intended?cited by 114
- 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 108
- 2021PartImageNet: A Large, High-Quality Dataset of Partscited by 107
- 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
- 2022B-cos Networks: Alignment is All We Need for Interpretabilitycited by 88
- 2023Telling Left from Right: Identifying Geometry-Aware Semantic Correspondencecited by 85
- 2025SAeUron: Interpretable Concept Unlearning in Diffusion Models with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 75
- 2025Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Modelscited by 67
- 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptationcited by 66
- 2021This Looks Like That... Does it? Shortcomings of Latent Space Prototype Interpretability in Deep Networkscited by 65
- 2021Look at the Variance! Efficient Black-box Explanations with Sobol-based Sensitivity Analysiscited by 65
- 2018Deep Feature Factorization For Concept Discoverycited by 64
- 2025Interpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoderscited by 54
- 2021Software for Dataset-wide XAI: From Local Explanations to Global Insights with Zennit, CoRelAy, and ViRelAycited by 53
- 2023FunnyBirds: A Synthetic Vision Dataset for a Part-Based Analysis of Explainable AI Methodscited by 49
- 2022Evaluation and Improvement of Interpretability for Self-Explainable Part-Prototype Networkscited by 37
- 2023B-cos Alignment for Inherently Interpretable CNNs and Vision Transformerscited by 31
- 2024PURE: Turning Polysemantic Neurons Into Pure Features by Identifying Relevant Circuitscited by 29
- 2023Disentangling Neuron Representations with Concept Vectorscited by 28
- 2023Interpretability Benchmark for Evaluating Spatial Misalignment of Prototypical Parts Explanationscited by 27
- 2025AnyUp: Universal Feature Upsamplingcited by 26
- 2025LoftUp: Learning a Coordinate-Based Feature Upsampler for Vision Foundation Modelscited by 23
50 most cited of 65 All 65 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.