Probing the Representational Power of Sparse Autoencoders in Vision Models
On the map: Diffusion models → Image generation, text-to-image and editing
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a popular tool for interpreting the hidden states of large language models (LLMs). By learning to reconstruct activations from a sparse bottleneck layer, SAEs discover interpretable features from the high-dimensional internal representations of LLMs. Despite their popularity with language models, SAEs remain understudied in the visual domain. In this work, we provide an extensive evaluation the representational power of SAEs for vision models using a broad range of image-based tasks. Our experimental results demonstrate that SAE features are semantically meaningful, improve out-of-distribution generalization, and enable controllable generation across three vision model architectures: vision embedding models, multi-modal LMMs and diffusion models. In vision embedding models, we find that learned SAE features can be used for OOD detection and provide evidence that they recover the ontological structure of the underlying model. For diffusion models, we demonstrate that SAEs enable semantic steering through text encoder manipulation and develop an automated pipeline for discovering human-interpretable attributes. Finally, we conduct exploratory experiments on multi-modal LLMs, finding evidence that SAE features reveal shared representations across vision and language modalities. Our study provides a foundation for SAE evaluation in vision models, highlighting their strong potential improving interpretability, generalization, and steerability in the visual domain.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Image generation, text-to-image and editing, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 41 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2025.
Builds on
41 of 55 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 40
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,847
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
28 more
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 405
- 2021Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?cited by 353
- 2021Generic Attention-model Explainability for Interpreting Bi-Modal and Encoder-Decoder Transformerscited by 320
- 2021MOS: Towards Scaling Out-of-distribution Detection for Large Semantic Spacecited by 233
- 2022Extracting Latent Steering Vectors from Pretrained Language Modelscited by 225
- 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 196
- 2023OpenOOD v1.5: Enhanced Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 179
- 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 179
- 2022Finetune like you pretrain: Improved finetuning of zero-shot vision modelscited by 150
- 2023In or Out? Fixing ImageNet Out-of-Distribution Detection Evaluationcited by 134
- 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probingcited by 115
- 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
- 2025SAeUron: Interpretable Concept Unlearning in Diffusion Models with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 80
- 2023Discovering Interpretable Directions in the Semantic Latent Space of Diffusion Modelscited by 60
- 2024A Concept-Based Explainability Framework for Large Multimodal Modelscited by 39
- 2024Efficient Dictionary Learning with Switch Sparse Autoencoderscited by 39
- 2024LVLM-Interpret: An Interpretability Tool for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 24
- 2023Understanding and Controlling a Maze-Solving Policy Networkcited by 22
- 2024Decomposing and Interpreting Image Representations via Text in ViTs Beyond CLIPcited by 20
- 2025Rethinking Evaluation of Sparse Autoencoders through the Representation of Polysemous Wordscited by 18
- 2023Trade-offs in Fine-tuned Diffusion Models Between Accuracy and Interpretabilitycited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 8.
10 papers.
- 2026Beyond Semantics: Disentangling Information Scope in Sparse Autoencoders for CLIPcited by 1
- 2026GeoSAE: Geometric Prior-Guided Layer-Wise Sparse Autoencoder Annotation of Brain MRI Foundation Modelscited by 1
- 2026Which Modality Decides? Counterfactual Modality Attribution for Multimodal LLMscited by 1
- 2025Correlates of Image Memorability in Vision Encoders: Activations, Attention Entropy, Patch Uniformity and Autoencoder Lossescited by 0
- 2025Concept-SAE: A Controllable and Invertible Concept Interface for Sparse Autoencoderscited by 0
- 2026Beyond the Hard Budget: Sparsity Regularizers for More Interpretable Top-k Sparse Autoencoderscited by 0
- 2026Multimodal Model Diffing for Feature Discovery and Controlcited by 0
- 2026Beyond a Bag of Features: Set-Level Instability in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 0
- 2026Verifying the Linear Representation Hypothesis: How Interpretable Are Vision SAEs?cited by 0
- 2026Metonymic Circuits for Abstract Concept Grounding in Vision Transformerscited by 0
- 2026Metonymic Circuits for Abstract Concept Grounding in Vision Transformers3 Oct 2026
- 2026Verifying the Linear Representation Hypothesis: How Interpretable Are Vision SAEs?28 Sep 2026
- 2026Beyond a Bag of Features: Set-Level Instability in Sparse Autoencoders11 Aug 2026
- 2026Multimodal Model Diffing for Feature Discovery and Control10 Aug 2026
- 2026Which Modality Decides? Counterfactual Modality Attribution for Multimodal LLMs29 Jul 2026
- 2026Beyond the Hard Budget: Sparsity Regularizers for More Interpretable Top-k Sparse Autoencoders25 Jun 2026
- 2026GeoSAE: Geometric Prior-Guided Layer-Wise Sparse Autoencoder Annotation of Brain MRI Foundation Models3 May 2026
- 2026Beyond Semantics: Disentangling Information Scope in Sparse Autoencoders for CLIP7 Apr 2026
- 2025Concept-SAE: A Controllable and Invertible Concept Interface for Sparse Autoencoders26 Sep 2025
- 2025Correlates of Image Memorability in Vision Encoders: Activations, Attention Entropy, Patch Uniformity and Autoencoder Losses1 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Interpreting the linear structure of vision-language model embedding spaces
- 2024Analyzing (In)Abilities of SAEs via Formal Languages
- 2025Interpretable and Testable Vision Features via Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Models
- 2025Analyzing Hierarchical Structure in Vision Models with Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025Interpreting Large Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Dictionary Learning
- 2024Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025Rethinking Sparse Autoencoders: Select-and-Project for Fairness and Control from Encoder Features Alone