mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fast Learning of Signed Distance Functions from Noisy Point Clouds via Noise to Noise Mapping

arXiv 2407.14225 ↗First posted 4 Jul 2024cs.CVcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning signed distance functions (SDFs) from point clouds is an important task in 3D computer vision. However, without ground truth signed distances, point normals or clean point clouds, current methods still struggle from learning SDFs from noisy point clouds. To overcome this challenge, we propose to learn SDFs via a noise to noise mapping, which does not require any clean point cloud or ground truth supervision. Our novelty lies in the noise to noise mapping which can infer a highly accurate SDF of a single object or scene from its multiple or even single noisy observations. We achieve this by a novel loss which enables statistical reasoning on point clouds and maintains geometric consistency although point clouds are irregular, unordered and have no point correspondence among noisy observations. To accelerate training, we use multi-resolution hash encodings implemented in CUDA in our framework, which reduces our training time by a factor of ten, achieving convergence within one minute. We further introduce a novel schema to improve multi-view reconstruction by estimating SDFs as a prior. Our evaluations under widely-used benchmarks demonstrate our superiority over the state-of-the-art methods in surface reconstruction from point clouds or multi-view images, point cloud denoising and upsampling.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 101 of its 134 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2024.

Builds on

101 of 134 references.

References · 101

  1. 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,723
  2. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,897
  3. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,689
  4. 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,041
  5. 2021NeuS: Learning Neural Implicit Surfaces by Volume Rendering for Multi-view Reconstructioncited by 1,712
  6. 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
  7. 2021Volume Rendering of Neural Implicit Surfacescited by 996
  8. 2016A Point Set Generation Network for 3D Object Reconstruction from a Single Imagecited by 979
  9. 2019Scene Representation Networks: Continuous 3D-Structure-Aware Neural Scene Representationscited by 864
  10. 2020Convolutional Occupancy Networkscited by 761
  11. 2020Implicit Geometric Regularization for Learning Shapescited by 710
  12. 2019Differentiable Volumetric Rendering: Learning Implicit 3D Representations without 3D Supervisioncited by 700
38 more
  1. 2021UNISURF: Unifying Neural Implicit Surfaces and Radiance Fields for Multi-View Reconstructioncited by 646
  2. 20163D-R2N2: A Unified Approach for Single and Multi-view 3D Object Reconstructioncited by 588
  3. 2018AtlasNet: A Papier-Mach'e Approach to Learning 3D Surface Generationcited by 539
  4. 2018Noise2Noise: Learning Image Restoration without Clean Datacited by 533
  5. 2022MonoSDF: Exploring Monocular Geometric Cues for Neural Implicit Surface Reconstructioncited by 470
  6. 2023Neuralangelo: High-Fidelity Neural Surface Reconstructioncited by 467
  7. 2021Neural Geometric Level of Detail: Real-time Rendering with Implicit 3D Shapescited by 426
  8. 2019SAL: Sign Agnostic Learning of Shapes from Raw Datacited by 390
  9. 2020Local Implicit Grid Representations for 3D Scenescited by 373
  10. 2020Implicit Functions in Feature Space for 3D Shape Reconstruction and Completioncited by 343
  11. 2019DISN: Deep Implicit Surface Network for High-quality Single-view 3D Reconstructioncited by 333
  12. 2020Deep Local Shapes: Learning Local SDF Priors for Detailed 3D Reconstructioncited by 321
  13. 2022NeuS2: Fast Learning of Neural Implicit Surfaces for Multi-view Reconstructioncited by 314
  14. 2020Neural Unsigned Distance Fields for Implicit Function Learningcited by 265
  15. 2019What Do Single-view 3D Reconstruction Networks Learn?cited by 260
  16. 2020Learning Gradient Fields for Shape Generationcited by 245
  17. 2019Learning Shape Templates with Structured Implicit Functionscited by 242
  18. 2023Uni3D: Exploring Unified 3D Representation at Scalecited by 237
  19. 2022Geo-Neus: Geometry-Consistent Neural Implicit Surfaces Learning for Multi-view Reconstructioncited by 212
  20. 2018PU-Net: Point Cloud Upsampling Networkcited by 209
  21. 2021Shape As Points: A Differentiable Poisson Solvercited by 187
  22. 2019DIST: Rendering Deep Implicit Signed Distance Function with Differentiable Sphere Tracingcited by 180
  23. 2021SnowflakeNet: Point Cloud Completion by Snowflake Point Deconvolution with Skip-Transformercited by 164
  24. 2019SDFDiff: Differentiable Rendering of Signed Distance Fields for 3D Shape Optimizationcited by 159
  25. 2020Neural-Pull: Learning Signed Distance Functions from Point Clouds by Learning to Pull Space onto Surfacescited by 147
  26. 2021Improving neural implicit surfaces geometry with patch warpingcited by 137
  27. 2022NeuRIS: Neural Reconstruction of Indoor Scenes Using Normal Priorscited by 125
  28. 2020Points2Surf: Learning Implicit Surfaces from Point Cloud Patchescited by 122
  29. 2022HF-NeuS: Improved Surface Reconstruction Using High-Frequency Detailscited by 121
  30. 2020SALD: Sign Agnostic Learning with Derivativescited by 115
  31. 2018Deep Geometric Prior for Surface Reconstructioncited by 110
  32. 2023Neural Kernel Surface Reconstructioncited by 104
  33. 2019PointCleanNet: Learning to Denoise and Remove Outliers from Dense Point Cloudscited by 99
  34. 2022Voxurf: Voxel-based Efficient and Accurate Neural Surface Reconstructioncited by 94
  35. 2021ShaRF: Shape-conditioned Radiance Fields from a Single Viewcited by 92
  36. 2022POCO: Point Convolution for Surface Reconstructioncited by 92
  37. 2021Score-Based Point Cloud Denoisingcited by 83
  38. 2020PatchNets: Patch-Based Generalizable Deep Implicit 3D Shape Representationscited by 81

50 most cited of 101 All 101 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: