Improving Label Error Detection and Elimination with Uncertainty Quantification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Identifying and handling label errors can significantly enhance the accuracy of supervised machine learning models. Recent approaches for identifying label errors demonstrate that a low self-confidence of models with respect to a certain label represents a good indicator of an erroneous label. However, latest work has built on softmax probabilities to measure self-confidence. In this paper, we argue that -- as softmax probabilities do not reflect a model's predictive uncertainty accurately -- label error detection requires more sophisticated measures of model uncertainty. Therefore, we develop a range of novel, model-agnostic algorithms for Uncertainty Quantification-Based Label Error Detection (UQ-LED), which combine the techniques of confident learning (CL), Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD), model uncertainty measures (e.g., entropy), and ensemble learning to enhance label error detection. We comprehensively evaluate our algorithms on four image classification benchmark datasets in two stages. In the first stage, we demonstrate that our UQ-LED algorithms outperform state-of-the-art confident learning in identifying label errors. In the second stage, we show that removing all identified errors from the training data based on our approach results in higher accuracies than training on all available labeled data. Importantly, besides our contributions to the detection of label errors, we particularly propose a novel approach to generate realistic, class-dependent label errors synthetically. Overall, our study demonstrates that selectively cleaning datasets with UQ-LED algorithms leads to more accurate classifications than using larger, noisier datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2024.
Builds on
28 of 50 references.
References · 28
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
16 more
- 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
- 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 338
- 2015Bayesian SegNet: Model Uncertainty in Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architectures for Scene Understandingcited by 218
- 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
- 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
- 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
- 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 122
- 2022DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Developmentcited by 90
- 2017Learning with Bounded Instance- and Label-dependent Label Noisecited by 57
- 2020AI Lifecycle Models Need To Be Revised. An Exploratory Study in Fintechcited by 33
- 2020Label Noise Types and Their Effects on Deep Learningcited by 29
- 2020A Survey on Deep Learning with Noisy Labels: How to train your model when you cannot trust on the annotations?cited by 25
- 2022Whose AI Dream? In search of the aspiration in data annotationcited by 24
- 2021Data Excellence for AI: Why Should You Carecited by 14
- 2020An Uncertainty-based Human-in-the-loop System for Industrial Tool Wear Analysiscited by 7
- 2021Exploiting Class Similarity for Machine Learning with Confidence Labels and Projective Loss Functionscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025From Label Error Detection to Correction: A Modular Framework and Benchmark for Object Detection Datasetscited by 0
- 2025Learning to Detect Label Errors by Making Them: A Method for Segmentation and Object Detection Datasetscited by 0
- 2026Algebraic Multigrid Acceleration for Efficient Label Spreadingcited by 0
- 2026Different Corruptions, Different Signals: Uncertainty and Loss in Federated Data Qualitycited by 0
- 2026Different Corruptions, Different Signals: Uncertainty and Loss in Federated Data Quality25 Sep 2026
- 2026Algebraic Multigrid Acceleration for Efficient Label Spreading26 Aug 2026
- 2025Learning to Detect Label Errors by Making Them: A Method for Segmentation and Object Detection Datasets25 Aug 2025
- 2025From Label Error Detection to Correction: A Modular Framework and Benchmark for Object Detection Datasets6 Aug 2025