Elucidating and Overcoming the Challenges of Label Noise in Supervised Contrastive Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Image classification datasets exhibit a non-negligible fraction of mislabeled examples, often due to human error when one class superficially resembles another. This issue poses challenges in supervised contrastive learning (SCL), where the goal is to cluster together data points of the same class in the embedding space while distancing those of disparate classes. While such methods outperform those based on cross-entropy, they are not immune to labeling errors. However, while the detrimental effects of noisy labels in supervised learning are well-researched, their influence on SCL remains largely unexplored. Hence, we analyse the effect of label errors and examine how they disrupt the SCL algorithm's ability to distinguish between positive and negative sample pairs. Our analysis reveals that human labeling errors manifest as easy positive samples in around 99% of cases. We, therefore, propose D-SCL, a novel Debiased Supervised Contrastive Learning objective designed to mitigate the bias introduced by labeling errors. We demonstrate that D-SCL consistently outperforms state-of-the-art techniques for representation learning across diverse vision benchmarks, offering improved robustness to label errors.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2023.
Builds on
46 of 66 references.
References · 46
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
- 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
34 more
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 619
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
- 2022Image as a Foreign Language: BEiT Pretraining for All Vision and Vision-Language Taskscited by 510
- 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
- 2020Hard Negative Mixing for Contrastive Learningcited by 399
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
- 2020Debiased Contrastive Learningcited by 354
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 275
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
- 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
- 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
- 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
- 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 121
- 2018Deep Metric Learning with Hierarchical Triplet Losscited by 112
- 2022Selective-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
- 2021Efficient Training of Visual Transformers with Small Datasetscited by 107
- 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
- 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
- 2021Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labelscited by 80
- 2020Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labelscited by 74
- 2020MoPro: Webly Supervised Learning with Momentum Prototypescited by 66
- 2021Open-set Label Noise Can Improve Robustness Against Inherent Label Noisecited by 58
- 2018Deep Bilevel Learningcited by 48
- 2022Annotation Error Detection: Analyzing the Past and Present for a More Coherent Futurecited by 45
- 2022Identifiability of Label Noise Transition Matrixcited by 34
- 2023Understanding Why ViT Trains Badly on Small Datasets: An Intuitive Perspectivecited by 28
- 2023Twin Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 28
- 2022CTRL: Clustering Training Losses for Label Error Detectioncited by 17
- 2023Quantifying and mitigating the impact of label errors on model disparity metricscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.