mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rethinking Importance Weighting for Transfer Learning

arXiv 2112.10157 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A key assumption in supervised learning is that training and test data follow the same probability distribution. However, this fundamental assumption is not always satisfied in practice, e.g., due to changing environments, sample selection bias, privacy concerns, or high labeling costs. Transfer learning (TL) relaxes this assumption and allows us to learn under distribution shift. Classical TL methods typically rely on importance-weighting -- a predictor is trained based on the training losses weighted according to the importance (i.e., the test-over-training density ratio). However, as real-world machine learning tasks are becoming increasingly complex, high-dimensional, and dynamical, novel approaches are explored to cope with such challenges recently. In this article, after introducing the foundation of TL based on importance-weighting, we review recent advances based on joint and dynamic importance-predictor estimation. Furthermore, we introduce a method of causal mechanism transfer that incorporates causal structure in TL. Finally, we discuss future perspectives of TL research.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2021.

Builds on

26 of 98 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  4. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  5. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  6. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  7. 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,288
  8. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  9. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 989
  10. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 675
  11. 2017A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networkscited by 513
  12. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 422
14 more
  1. 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 366
  2. 2018Nonlinear ICA Using Auxiliary Variables and Generalized Contrastive Learningcited by 282
  3. 2018What is the Effect of Importance Weighting in Deep Learning?cited by 251
  4. 2020Understanding Self-Training for Gradual Domain Adaptationcited by 149
  5. 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 122
  6. 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
  7. 2020Rethinking Importance Weighting for Deep Learning under Distribution Shiftcited by 93
  8. 2020Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism Approximatorscited by 85
  9. 2019Causal Discovery with General Non-Linear Relationships Using Non-Linear ICAcited by 58
  10. 2018Transfer Learning for Related Reinforcement Learning Tasks via Image-to-Image Translationcited by 50
  11. 2020Few-shot Domain Adaptation by Causal Mechanism Transfercited by 47
  12. 2020A One-step Approach to Covariate Shift Adaptationcited by 21
  13. 2015Scaling-up Empirical Risk Minimization: Optimization of Incomplete U-statisticscited by 17
  14. 2013Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation with Non-Parametric Copulascited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

11 papers.