Advancing Machine-Generated Text Detection from an Easy to Hard Supervision Perspective
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing machine-generated text (MGT) detection methods implicitly assume labels as the "golden standard". However, we reveal boundary ambiguity in MGT detection, implying that traditional training paradigms are inexact. Moreover, limitations of human cognition and the superintelligence of detectors make inexact learning widespread and inevitable. To this end, we propose an easy-to-hard enhancement framework to provide reliable supervision under such inexact conditions. Distinct from knowledge distillation, our framework employs an easy supervisor targeting relatively simple longer-text detection tasks (despite weaker capabilities), to enhance the more challenging target detector. Firstly, longer texts targeted by supervisors theoretically alleviate the impact of inexact labels, laying the foundation for reliable supervision. Secondly, by structurally incorporating the detector into the supervisor, we theoretically model the supervisor as a lower performance bound for the detector. Thus, optimizing the supervisor indirectly optimizes the detector, ultimately approximating the underlying "golden" labels. Extensive experiments across diverse practical scenarios, including cross-LLM, cross-domain, mixed text, and paraphrase attacks, demonstrate the framework's significant detection effectiveness. The code is available at: https://github.com/tmlr-group/Easy2Hard.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2025.
Builds on
50 of 63 references.
References · 50
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
38 more
- 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 429
- 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 386
- 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Textcited by 299
- 2021All That's 'Human' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Textcited by 287
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
- 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
- 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
- 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 190
- 2023In-Context Impersonation Reveals Large Language Models' Strengths and Biasescited by 155
- 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 132
- 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 129
- 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 122
- 2023Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 112
- 2019Real or Fake? Learning to Discriminate Machine from Human Generated Textcited by 99
- 2023Combating Misinformation in the Age of LLMs: Opportunities and Challengescited by 95
- 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Modelscited by 92
- 2023Ghostbuster: Detecting Text Ghostwritten by Large Language Modelscited by 91
- 2023Watermarks in the Sand: Impossibility of Strong Watermarking for Generative Modelscited by 87
- 2023On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 81
- 2021Sparks: Inspiration for Science Writing using Language Modelscited by 80
- 2024Adaptive Text Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 67
- 2023Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 61
- 2023Automating Customer Service using LangChain: Building custom open-source GPT Chatbot for organizationscited by 61
- 2023SeqXGPT: Sentence-Level AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 56
- 2024DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 53
- 2020Neural Deepfake Detection with Factual Structure of Textcited by 41
- 2024DetectRL: Benchmarking LLM-Generated Text Detection in Real-World Scenarioscited by 38
- 2023WatME: Towards Lossless Watermarking Through Lexical Redundancycited by 27
- 2024Beemo: Benchmark of Expert-edited Machine-generated Outputscited by 27
- 2024Measure-Observe-Remeasure: An Interactive Paradigm for Differentially-Private Exploratory Analysiscited by 24
- 2024Detecting Subtle Differences between Human and Model Languages Using Spectrum of Relative Likelihoodcited by 24
- 2024Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methodscited by 23
- 2024Detecting Machine-Generated Texts by Multi-Population Aware Optimization for Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 20
- 2024DALD: Improving Logits-based Detector without Logits from Black-box LLMscited by 13
- 2024Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text using Token Cohesivenesscited by 13
- 2024Machine-Generated Text Localizationcited by 11
- 2024ReMoDetect: Reward Models Recognize Aligned LLM's Generationscited by 11
- 2024Deep Learning Detection Method for Large Language Models-Generated Scientific Contentcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Linear Probing Provides Robust and Efficient Detection of Machine-Generated Text
- 2026READER: Reasoning-Enhanced AI-Generated Text Detection
- 2025Stress-testing Machine Generated Text Detection: Shifting Language Models Writing Style to Fool Detectors
- 2026Detecting the Machine: A Comprehensive Benchmark of AI-Generated Text Detectors Across Architectures, Domains, and Adversarial Conditions
- 2025Machine Text Detectors are Membership Inference Attacks
- 2026SV-Detect: AI-generated Text Detection with Steering Vectors
- 2025Kill two birds with one stone: generalized and robust AI-generated text detection via dynamic perturbations
- 2023AuthentiGPT: Detecting Machine-Generated Text via Black-Box Language Models Denoising