An Adaptive Data cleaning Framework for Noisy Label Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks (DNNs) excel in computer vision tasks given large annotated datasets. In real-world applications, however, labels are often corrupted by ambiguity, human error, or dynamic environments. Over-parameterized DNNs easily memorize these noisy labels during training, degrading model accuracy and generalization. Existing data-cleaning and sample-selection strategies often rely on manually specified thresholds, prior knowledge of the noise ratio, or a single metric (either learning dynamics or geometric structure), making them unstable in complex data regimes. This paper proposes a self-adaptive data-cleaning framework that integrates local, global, and learning dynamics cues for robust noisy-label detection. Samples are mapped into a unified low-dimensional feature space through a modular feature concatenation paradigm. We provide two instantiations: a 2D metric integrating class-adaptive KNN-based local disagreement with k-means-based global centroid distance, and a 3D multi-metric that additionally incorporates a z-normalized score. Unlike conventional 1D Gaussian Mixture Models applied to a single scalar metric, our framework performs multi-metric clustering on the feature space to adaptively partition samples into clean-dominant and noise-dominant components without requiring manual thresholds or noise priors. Experiments on CIFAR-10, MNIST, and ImageNet-100 with 5% to 40% symmetric label noise show high recall across settings, including near-perfect recall (>=98%) on ImageNet-100 at 40% noise. Subsequent training yields accuracy gains across evaluated settings, especially under severe corruption on ImageNet-100. These findings suggest that multi-metric integration provides a threshold-free, practical, and low-tuning strategy for noisy label detection.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.
Builds on
15 of 31 references.
References · 15
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
- 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 121
- 2022Selective-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.