mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Data Quality in Edge Machine Learning: A State-of-the-Art Survey

arXiv 2406.02600 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data-driven Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems trained using Machine Learning (ML) are shaping an ever-increasing (in size and importance) portion of our lives, including, but not limited to, recommendation systems, autonomous driving technologies, healthcare diagnostics, financial services, and personalized marketing. On the one hand, the outsized influence of these systems imposes a high standard of quality, particularly in the data used to train them. On the other hand, establishing and maintaining standards of Data Quality (DQ) becomes more challenging due to the proliferation of Edge Computing and Internet of Things devices, along with their increasing adoption for training and deploying ML models. The nature of the edge environment -- characterized by limited resources, decentralized data storage, and processing -- exacerbates data-related issues, making them more frequent, severe, and difficult to detect and mitigate. From these observations, it follows that DQ research for edge ML is a critical and urgent exploration track for the safety and robust usefulness of present and future AI systems. Despite this fact, DQ research for edge ML is still in its infancy. The literature on this subject remains fragmented and scattered across different research communities, with no comprehensive survey to date. Hence, this paper aims to fill this gap by providing a global view of the existing literature from multiple disciplines that can be grouped under the umbrella of DQ for edge ML. Specifically, we present a tentative definition of data quality in Edge computing, which we use to establish a set of DQ dimensions. We explore each dimension in detail, including existing solutions for mitigation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 108 of its 224 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2024.

Builds on

108 of 224 references.

References · 108

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  3. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  4. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  5. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  6. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  7. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
  8. 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,099
  9. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  10. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  11. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  12. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
38 more
  1. 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
  2. 2023Extracting Training Data from Diffusion Modelscited by 723
  3. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
  4. 2017Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 669
  5. 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 626
  6. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  7. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  8. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 509
  9. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
  10. 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 499
  11. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
  12. 2019Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 451
  13. 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 431
  14. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  15. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
  16. 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Surveycited by 345
  17. 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 326
  18. 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 324
  19. 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 306
  20. 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 266
  21. 2019Improving Federated Learning Personalization via Model Agnostic Meta Learningcited by 264
  22. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
  23. 2018Communication-Efficient On-Device Machine Learning: Federated Distillation and Augmentation under Non-IID Private Datacited by 242
  24. 2018Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learningcited by 242
  25. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
  26. 2019Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence with Edge Computingcited by 225
  27. 2023Text Embeddings Reveal (Almost) As Much As Textcited by 189
  28. 2018Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoningcited by 158
  29. 2018RSA: Byzantine-Robust Stochastic Aggregation Methods for Distributed Learning from Heterogeneous Datasetscited by 148
  30. 2020FedPD: A Federated Learning Framework with Optimal Rates and Adaptivity to Non-IID Datacited by 143
  31. 2022Reconstructing Training Data with Informed Adversariescited by 143
  32. 2020Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimizationcited by 137
  33. 2020Handling Missing Data with Graph Representation Learningcited by 132
  34. 2021Fit without fear: remarkable mathematical phenomena of deep learning through the prism of interpolationcited by 130
  35. 2022Reconstructing Training Data from Trained Neural Networkscited by 129
  36. 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 121
  37. 2021Back to the Drawing Board: A Critical Evaluation of Poisoning Attacks on Production Federated Learningcited by 116
  38. 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspectivecited by 116

50 most cited of 108 All 108 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.