Noisy Ostracods: A Fine-Grained, Imbalanced Real-World Dataset for Benchmarking Robust Machine Learning and Label Correction Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present the Noisy Ostracods, a noisy dataset for genus and species classification of crustacean ostracods with specialists' annotations. Over the 71466 specimens collected, 5.58% of them are estimated to be noisy (possibly problematic) at genus level. The dataset is created to addressing a real-world challenge: creating a clean fine-grained taxonomy dataset. The Noisy Ostracods dataset has diverse noises from multiple sources. Firstly, the noise is open-set, including new classes discovered during curation that were not part of the original annotation. The dataset has pseudo-classes, where annotators misclassified samples that should belong to an existing class into a new pseudo-class. The Noisy Ostracods dataset is highly imbalanced with a imbalance factor ρ = 22429. This presents a unique challenge for robust machine learning methods, as existing approaches have not been extensively evaluated on fine-grained classification tasks with such diverse real-world noise. Initial experiments using current robust learning techniques have not yielded significant performance improvements on the Noisy Ostracods dataset compared to cross-entropy training on the raw, noisy data. On the other hand, noise detection methods have underperformed in error hit rate compared to naive cross-validation ensembling for identifying problematic labels. These findings suggest that the fine-grained, imbalanced nature, and complex noise characteristics of the dataset present considerable challenges for existing noise-robust algorithms. By openly releasing the Noisy Ostracods dataset, our goal is to encourage further research into the development of noise-resilient machine learning methods capable of effectively handling diverse, real-world noise in fine-grained classification tasks. The dataset, along with its evaluation protocols, can be accessed at https://github.com/H-Jamieu/Noisyostracods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2024.
Builds on
44 of 67 references.
References · 44
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
32 more
- 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,228
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,136
- 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 960
- 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 943
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
- 2022MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformercited by 476
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
- 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 320
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 261
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
- 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 235
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 122
- 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
- 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
- 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 58
- 2021Interactive Label Cleaning with Example-based Explanationscited by 49
- 2023A Step Towards Worldwide Biodiversity Assessment: The BIOSCAN-1M Insect Datasetcited by 30
- 2023Unmasking and Improving Data Credibility: A Study with Datasets for Training Harmless Language Modelscited by 26
- 2022Class-Difficulty Based Methods for Long-Tailed Visual Recognitioncited by 23
- 2024Why is SAM Robust to Label Noise?cited by 21
- 2023AQuA: A Benchmarking Tool for Label Quality Assessmentcited by 16
- 2023When does Privileged Information Explain Away Label Noise?cited by 10
- 2024Estimating Noisy Class Posterior with Part-level Labels for Noisy Label Learningcited by 7
- 2022Dynamic Loss For Robust Learningcited by 6
- 2023An Empirical Study of Automated Mislabel Detection in Real World Vision Datasetscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.