AIM: Attributing, Interpreting, Mitigating Data Unfairness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data collected in the real world often encapsulates historical discrimination against disadvantaged groups and individuals. Existing fair machine learning (FairML) research has predominantly focused on mitigating discriminative bias in the model prediction, with far less effort dedicated towards exploring how to trace biases present in the data, despite its importance for the transparency and interpretability of FairML. To fill this gap, we investigate a novel research problem: discovering samples that reflect biases/prejudices from the training data. Grounding on the existing fairness notions, we lay out a sample bias criterion and propose practical algorithms for measuring and countering sample bias. The derived bias score provides intuitive sample-level attribution and explanation of historical bias in data. On this basis, we further design two FairML strategies via sample-bias-informed minimal data editing. They can mitigate both group and individual unfairness at the cost of minimal or zero predictive utility loss. Extensive experiments and analyses on multiple real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods in explaining and mitigating unfairness. Code is available at https://github.com/ZhiningLiu1998/AIM.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2024.
Builds on
27 of 74 references.
References · 27
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
- 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
- 2018Online Learning: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 205
- 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
- 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
- 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 122
15 more
- 2018A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indicescited by 97
- 2020Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected Groupscited by 78
- 2019Training individually fair ML models with Sensitive Subspace Robustnesscited by 73
- 2016A causal framework for discovering and removing direct and indirect discriminationcited by 71
- 2020Two Simple Ways to Learn Individual Fairness Metrics from Datacited by 54
- 2019AdaFair: Cumulative Fairness Adaptive Boostingcited by 45
- 2020SenSeI: Sensitive Set Invariance for Enforcing Individual Fairnesscited by 37
- 2019Self-paced Ensemble for Highly Imbalanced Massive Data Classificationcited by 28
- 2020MESA: Boost Ensemble Imbalanced Learning with MEta-SAmplercited by 25
- 2023Hierarchical Multi-Marginal Optimal Transport for Network Alignmentcited by 24
- 2022Counterfactual Fairness Is Basically Demographic Paritycited by 15
- 2020Crowd, Lending, Machine, and Biascited by 13
- 2022Learning Antidote Data to Individual Unfairnesscited by 8
- 2021IMBENS: Ensemble Class-imbalanced Learning in Pythoncited by 6
- 2020Abstracting Fairness: Oracles, Metrics, and Interpretabilitycited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2025SelfElicit: Your Language Model Secretly Knows Where is the Relevant Evidencecited by 18
- 2025Pave Your Own Path: Graph Gradual Domain Adaptation on Fused Gromov-Wasserstein Geodesicscited by 17
- 2024Ask, and it shall be given: On the Turing completeness of promptingcited by 10
- 2024InterFormer: Effective Heterogeneous Interaction Learning for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 8
- 2025Underrepresentation, Label Bias, and Proxies: Towards Data Bias Profiles for the EU AI Act and Beyondcited by 2
- 2025Saffron-1: Safety Inference Scalingcited by 1
- 2025Graph Homophily Booster: Rethinking the Role of Discrete Features on Heterophilic Graphscited by 1
- 2026Graph homophily booster: Reimagining the role of discrete features in heterophilic graph learningcited by 1
- 2026Structuring and Tokenizing Distributed User Interest Context for Generative Recommendationcited by 0
- 2026Structuring and Tokenizing Distributed User Interest Context for Generative Recommendation18 Jun 2026
- 2026Graph homophily booster: Reimagining the role of discrete features in heterophilic graph learning6 Feb 2026
- 2025Graph Homophily Booster: Rethinking the Role of Discrete Features on Heterophilic Graphs16 Sep 2025
- 2025Underrepresentation, Label Bias, and Proxies: Towards Data Bias Profiles for the EU AI Act and Beyond9 Jul 2025
- 2025Saffron-1: Safety Inference Scaling6 Jun 2025
- 2025Pave Your Own Path: Graph Gradual Domain Adaptation on Fused Gromov-Wasserstein Geodesics19 May 2025
- 2025SelfElicit: Your Language Model Secretly Knows Where is the Relevant Evidence12 Feb 2025
- 2024InterFormer: Effective Heterogeneous Interaction Learning for Click-Through Rate Prediction15 Nov 2024
- 2024Ask, and it shall be given: On the Turing completeness of prompting4 Nov 2024