mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AIM: Attributing, Interpreting, Mitigating Data Unfairness

arXiv 2406.08819 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data collected in the real world often encapsulates historical discrimination against disadvantaged groups and individuals. Existing fair machine learning (FairML) research has predominantly focused on mitigating discriminative bias in the model prediction, with far less effort dedicated towards exploring how to trace biases present in the data, despite its importance for the transparency and interpretability of FairML. To fill this gap, we investigate a novel research problem: discovering samples that reflect biases/prejudices from the training data. Grounding on the existing fairness notions, we lay out a sample bias criterion and propose practical algorithms for measuring and countering sample bias. The derived bias score provides intuitive sample-level attribution and explanation of historical bias in data. On this basis, we further design two FairML strategies via sample-bias-informed minimal data editing. They can mitigate both group and individual unfairness at the cost of minimal or zero predictive utility loss. Extensive experiments and analyses on multiple real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods in explaining and mitigating unfairness. Code is available at https://github.com/ZhiningLiu1998/AIM.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2024.

Builds on

27 of 74 references.

References · 27

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  4. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  5. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  6. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
  7. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
  8. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
  9. 2018Online Learning: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 205
  10. 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
  11. 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
  12. 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 122
15 more
  1. 2018A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indicescited by 97
  2. 2020Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected Groupscited by 78
  3. 2019Training individually fair ML models with Sensitive Subspace Robustnesscited by 73
  4. 2016A causal framework for discovering and removing direct and indirect discriminationcited by 71
  5. 2020Two Simple Ways to Learn Individual Fairness Metrics from Datacited by 54
  6. 2019AdaFair: Cumulative Fairness Adaptive Boostingcited by 45
  7. 2020SenSeI: Sensitive Set Invariance for Enforcing Individual Fairnesscited by 37
  8. 2019Self-paced Ensemble for Highly Imbalanced Massive Data Classificationcited by 28
  9. 2020MESA: Boost Ensemble Imbalanced Learning with MEta-SAmplercited by 25
  10. 2023Hierarchical Multi-Marginal Optimal Transport for Network Alignmentcited by 24
  11. 2022Counterfactual Fairness Is Basically Demographic Paritycited by 15
  12. 2020Crowd, Lending, Machine, and Biascited by 13
  13. 2022Learning Antidote Data to Individual Unfairnesscited by 8
  14. 2021IMBENS: Ensemble Class-imbalanced Learning in Pythoncited by 6
  15. 2020Abstracting Fairness: Oracles, Metrics, and Interpretabilitycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

9 papers.