mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Sign Language Recognition under Label Noise: A Study of Noise-Robust Losses for Isolated and Continuous Settings

arXiv 2609.12885 ↗First posted 11 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In sign language recognition, the isolated (ISLR) classification loss treats a single label as ground truth, as does the frame-level auxiliary classifier over pseudo-labels we add to continuous (CSLR) methods, which lack one. Stylistic variation blurs ISLR annotation and the lack of temporal boundaries in CSLR forces pseudo-labels; both are noisy. We therefore apply symmetric and generalized cross entropy (SCE, GCE), robust alternatives to cross entropy (CE) from image classification, not to connectionist temporal classification but to the preceding single-label classifier. On ASL Citizen with injected symmetric noise on three backbones (three seeds for ST-GCN), robust losses cost at most 2.5 pt when labels are clean and beat CE by 2.9-10.0 pt in all six conditions at noise rate 0.2, one of which only after q was re-selected on dev. GCE gains more, but its optimal q does not transfer across backbones, whereas one SCE setting works in all nine conditions; both vary 2-11 times more than CE across runs, so a favorable point estimate does not establish stability. For CSLR (PHOENIX-2014) we report no gain; our frame-level targets carry a systematic assignment bias, making that study a diagnosis of a single configuration. At lambda_aux = 25 the pseudo-label CE auxiliary raises word error rate above the no-auxiliary baseline on VAC, CorrNet and SlowFastSign, and GCE/SCE improve on CE by 1.7-3.2 pt (three of six conditions return below that baseline). However, the three losses differ by more than an order of magnitude in effective gradient at a common lambda_aux: matching the initial gradient shrinks the gap to 0.4-0.9 pt, and lowering the CE weight alone already beats that baseline, so neither the degradation nor the improvement can be separated from the effect of the weight. We use only symmetric noise; multi-seed evaluation covers only ST-GCN and VAC isolated.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2026.

Builds on

26 of 39 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
  2. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,620
  3. 2022VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Trainingcited by 1,322
  4. 2018Spatial Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognitioncited by 1,209
  5. 2021Video Swin Transformercited by 1,091
  6. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  7. 2021MViTv2: Improved Multiscale Vision Transformers for Classification and Detectioncited by 519
  8. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  9. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
  10. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  11. 2020Sign Language Transformers: Joint End-to-end Sign Language Recognition and Translationcited by 256
  12. 2019Word-level Deep Sign Language Recognition from Video: A New Large-scale Dataset and Methods Comparisoncited by 218
14 more
  1. 2021Improving Sign Language Translation with Monolingual Data by Sign Back-Translationcited by 179
  2. 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 122
  3. 2021Visual Alignment Constraint for Continuous Sign Language Recognitioncited by 80
  4. 2022A Simple Multi-Modality Transfer Learning Baseline for Sign Language Translationcited by 80
  5. 2020Multi-channel Transformers for Multi-articulatory Sign Language Translationcited by 71
  6. 2023Continuous Sign Language Recognition with Correlation Networkcited by 56
  7. 2021Asymmetric Loss Functions for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 46
  8. 2023ASL Citizen: A Community-Sourced Dataset for Advancing Isolated Sign Language Recognitioncited by 34
  9. 2022Machine Translation from Signed to Spoken Languages: State of the Art and Challengescited by 20
  10. 2024Systemic Biases in Sign Language AI Research: A Deaf-Led Call to Reevaluate Research Agendascited by 19
  11. 2020Learning Adaptive Loss for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 10
  12. 2023Enhancing Noise-Robust Losses for Large-Scale Noisy Data Learningcited by 3
  13. 2024Improving Continuous Sign Language Recognition with Adapted Image Modelscited by 3
  14. 2025AEON: Adaptive Estimation of Instance-Dependent In-Distribution and Out-of-Distribution Label Noise for Robust Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.