GFLC: Graph-based Fairness-aware Label Correction for Fair Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fairness in machine learning (ML) has a critical importance for building trustworthy machine learning system as artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly impact various aspects of society, including healthcare decisions and legal judgments. Moreover, numerous studies demonstrate evidence of unfair outcomes in ML and the need for more robust fairness-aware methods. However, the data we use to train and develop debiasing techniques often contains biased and noisy labels. As a result, the label bias in the training data affects model performance and misrepresents the fairness of classifiers during testing. To tackle this problem, our paper presents Graph-based Fairness-aware Label Correction (GFLC), an efficient method for correcting label noise while preserving demographic parity in datasets. In particular, our approach combines three key components: prediction confidence measure, graph-based regularization through Ricci-flow-optimized graph Laplacians, and explicit demographic parity incentives. Our experimental findings show the effectiveness of our proposed approach and show significant improvements in the trade-off between performance and fairness metrics compared to the baseline.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2025.
Builds on
24 of 37 references.
References · 24
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2021Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvaturecited by 478
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
- 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 147
- 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 122
- 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
- 2022Revisiting Over-smoothing and Over-squashing Using Ollivier-Ricci Curvaturecited by 98
- 2020Fair Classification with Group-Dependent Label Noisecited by 67
- 2019Community Detection on Networks with Ricci Flowcited by 62
- 2019Noise-tolerant fair classificationcited by 40
12 more
- 2022Turning the Tables: Biased, Imbalanced, Dynamic Tabular Datasets for ML Evaluationcited by 40
- 2020Fairness Evaluation in Presence of Biased Noisy Labelscited by 38
- 2016Characterizing Complex Networks with Forman-Ricci Curvature and Associated Geometric Flowscited by 21
- 2021Can Less be More? When Increasing-to-Balancing Label Noise Rates Considered Beneficialcited by 13
- 2016Forman-Ricci flow for change detection in large dynamic data setscited by 7
- 2020Analysis of label noise in graph-based semi-supervised learningcited by 6
- 2023Graph Laplacian for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 5
- 2023Leveraging an Alignment Set in Tackling Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 4
- 2024Aequitas Flow: Streamlining Fair ML Experimentationcited by 4
- 2023Systematic analysis of the impact of label noise correction on ML Fairnesscited by 2
- 2023LaplaceConfidence: a Graph-based Approach for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 1
- 2024Fair-OBNC: Correcting Label Noise for Fairer Datasetscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.