mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Losses over Labels: Weakly Supervised Learning via Direct Loss Construction

arXiv 2212.06921 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2022cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Owing to the prohibitive costs of generating large amounts of labeled data, programmatic weak supervision is a growing paradigm within machine learning. In this setting, users design heuristics that provide noisy labels for subsets of the data. These weak labels are combined (typically via a graphical model) to form pseudolabels, which are then used to train a downstream model. In this work, we question a foundational premise of the typical weakly supervised learning pipeline: given that the heuristic provides all ``label" information, why do we need to generate pseudolabels at all? Instead, we propose to directly transform the heuristics themselves into corresponding loss functions that penalize differences between our model and the heuristic. By constructing losses directly from the heuristics, we can incorporate more information than is used in the standard weakly supervised pipeline, such as how the heuristics make their decisions, which explicitly informs feature selection during training. We call our method Losses over Labels (LoL) as it creates losses directly from heuristics without going through the intermediate step of a label. We show that LoL improves upon existing weak supervision methods on several benchmark text and image classification tasks and further demonstrate that incorporating gradient information leads to better performance on almost every task.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2022.

Builds on

33 of 56 references.

References · 33

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  3. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  4. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  5. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 536
  6. 2020Meta Pseudo Labelscited by 372
  7. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
  8. 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
  9. 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 121
  10. 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
  11. 2020Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet Methodscited by 98
  12. 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 95
21 more
  1. 2020Fine-Tuning Pre-trained Language Model with Weak Supervision: A Contrastive-Regularized Self-Training Approachcited by 83
  2. 2022A Survey on Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 66
  3. 2020Learning from Rules Generalizing Labeled Exemplarscited by 59
  4. 2018Snorkel DryBell: A Case Study in Deploying Weak Supervision at Industrial Scalecited by 52
  5. 2016Trace Norm Regularised Deep Multi-Task Learningcited by 50
  6. 2017Learning the Structure of Generative Models without Labeled Datacited by 50
  7. 2021Self-Training with Weak Supervisioncited by 49
  8. 2021End-to-End Weak Supervisioncited by 33
  9. 2019A Principled Approach for Learning Task Similarity in Multitask Learningcited by 32
  10. 2017Latent Multi-task Architecture Learningcited by 29
  11. 2021Universalizing Weak Supervisioncited by 27
  12. 2021DP-SSL: Towards Robust Semi-supervised Learning with A Few Labeled Samplescited by 18
  13. 2020Curriculum Labeling: Revisiting Pseudo-Labeling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 14
  14. 2021Learning from Multiple Noisy Partial Labelerscited by 14
  15. 2021Creating Training Sets via Weak Indirect Supervisioncited by 14
  16. 2021Active WeaSuL: Improving Weak Supervision with Active Learningcited by 12
  17. 2020Constrained Labeling for Weakly Supervised Learningcited by 10
  18. 2015Optimally Combining Classifiers Using Unlabeled Datacited by 9
  19. 2013Minimax Optimal Convergence Rates for Estimating Ground Truth from Crowdsourced Labelscited by 7
  20. 2021Comparing the Value of Labeled and Unlabeled Data in Method-of-Moments Latent Variable Estimationcited by 7
  21. 2022Data Consistency for Weakly Supervised Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.

11 papers.