mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Planetary Feature Fields are Scalable Earth Representations

arXiv 2609.37784 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Satellite observations, precomputed embeddings, and map products describe the same evolving Earth, yet are stored as independent, petabyte-scale data products. Their continued growth calls for compact representations of multiple products while preserving spatial and temporal detail. We introduce Planetary Feature Fields (PFFs), which exploit redundancy across data products by modeling them jointly as continuous functions of space and time at planetary scale. PFFs are spatially local explicit-implicit (hybrid) neural fields. Each field shares a factored feature volume---a decomposition of an explicit 3D grid with smaller factors---across products, while lightweight implicit decoders reconstruct individual products across multiple timesteps. PFFs reconstruct EO products over space and time more accurately than single-product fields at matched compression rates. At 1800× compression relative to the uncompressed source data, reconstructed features retain approximately 90% or more of the performance achieved with the original features on pixel-level segmentation, change detection, and patch-level classification tasks. PFFs can add new timesteps by extending their factored feature volumes and add new products by attaching new decoders, while leaving existing outputs unchanged. PFFs reduce end-to-end feature access latency by an order of magnitude relative to evaluated API and cloud-storage pipelines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 100 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

66 of 100 references.

References · 66

  1. 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,141
  2. 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,698
  3. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,682
  4. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
  5. 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,170
  6. 2021Mip-NeRF: A Multiscale Representation for Anti-Aliasing Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 1,957
  7. 2021Plenoxels: Radiance Fields without Neural Networkscited by 1,607
  8. 2020pixelNeRF: Neural Radiance Fields from One or Few Imagescited by 1,574
  9. 2022TensoRF: Tensorial Radiance Fieldscited by 1,275
  10. 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
  11. 2020Neural Sparse Voxel Fieldscited by 959
  12. 2021PlenOctrees for Real-time Rendering of Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 904
38 more
  1. 2023K-Planes: Explicit Radiance Fields in Space, Time, and Appearancecited by 742
  2. 2021MVSNeRF: Fast Generalizable Radiance Field Reconstruction from Multi-View Stereocited by 735
  3. 2022Block-NeRF: Scalable Large Scene Neural View Synthesiscited by 720
  4. 2021KiloNeRF: Speeding up Neural Radiance Fields with Thousands of Tiny MLPscited by 672
  5. 2023HexPlane: A Fast Representation for Dynamic Scenescited by 582
  6. 2023LERF: Language Embedded Radiance Fieldscited by 538
  7. 2021Mega-NeRF: Scalable Construction of Large-Scale NeRFs for Virtual Fly-Throughscited by 396
  8. 2022Decomposing NeRF for Editing via Feature Field Distillationcited by 370
  9. 2019Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learningcited by 264
  10. 2021NeRV: Neural Representations for Videoscited by 255
  11. 2021COIN: COmpression with Implicit Neural representationscited by 232
  12. 2022Neural Feature Fusion Fields: 3D Distillation of Self-Supervised 2D Image Representationscited by 195
  13. 2023GeoCLIP: Clip-Inspired Alignment between Locations and Images for Effective Worldwide Geo-localizationcited by 185
  14. 2022From data to functa: Your data point is a function and you can treat it like onecited by 183
  15. 2021Implicit Neural Representations for Image Compressioncited by 161
  16. 2023SatCLIP: Global, General-Purpose Location Embeddings with Satellite Imagerycited by 148
  17. 2021Panoptic Segmentation of Satellite Image Time Series with Convolutional Temporal Attention Networkscited by 141
  18. 2023Distilled Feature Fields Enable Few-Shot Language-Guided Manipulationcited by 130
  19. 2025AlphaEarth Foundations: An embedding field model for accurate and efficient global mapping from sparse label datacited by 122
  20. 2019Presence-Only Geographical Priors for Fine-Grained Image Classificationcited by 109
  21. 2023Lightweight, Pre-trained Transformers for Remote Sensing Timeseriescited by 102
  22. 2022A high-resolution canopy height model of the Earthcited by 91
  23. 2022COIN++: Neural Compression Across Modalitiescited by 81
  24. 2023CSP: Self-Supervised Contrastive Spatial Pre-Training for Geospatial-Visual Representationscited by 67
  25. 2023Geographic Location Encoding with Spherical Harmonics and Sinusoidal Representation Networkscited by 61
  26. 2023Spatial Implicit Neural Representations for Global-Scale Species Mappingcited by 57
  27. 2023Spatial Functa: Scaling Functa to ImageNet Classification and Generationcited by 55
  28. 2021A Review of Location Encoding for GeoAI: Methods and Applicationscited by 53
  29. 2024reBEN: Refined BigEarthNet Dataset for Remote Sensing Image Analysiscited by 48
  30. 2023FeatureNeRF: Learning Generalizable NeRFs by Distilling Foundation Modelscited by 47
  31. 2025Galileo: Learning Global & Local Features of Many Remote Sensing Modalitiescited by 41
  32. 2025TESSERA: Temporal Embeddings of Surface Spectra for Earth Representation and Analysiscited by 35
  33. 2022Compressing multidimensional weather and climate data into neural networkscited by 31
  34. 2023CLNeRF: Continual Learning Meets NeRFcited by 23
  35. 2024Fields of The World: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset For Global Agricultural Field Boundary Segmentationcited by 23
  36. 2025GEO-Bench-2: From Performance to Capability, Rethinking Evaluation in Geospatial AIcited by 19
  37. 2025RANGE: Retrieval Augmented Neural Fields for Multi-Resolution Geo-Embeddingscited by 18
  38. 2024Learning Transferable Features for Implicit Neural Representationscited by 14

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.