mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Models

arXiv 2502.12892 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2025cs.CVcited by 67

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a powerful framework for machine learning interpretability, enabling the unsupervised decomposition of model representations into a dictionary of abstract, human-interpretable concepts. However, we reveal a fundamental limitation: existing SAEs exhibit severe instability, as identical models trained on similar datasets can produce sharply different dictionaries, undermining their reliability as an interpretability tool. To address this issue, we draw inspiration from the Archetypal Analysis framework introduced by Cutler & Breiman (1994) and present Archetypal SAEs (A-SAE), wherein dictionary atoms are constrained to the convex hull of data. This geometric anchoring significantly enhances the stability of inferred dictionaries, and their mildly relaxed variants RA-SAEs further match state-of-the-art reconstruction abilities. To rigorously assess dictionary quality learned by SAEs, we introduce two new benchmarks that test (i) plausibility, if dictionaries recover "true" classification directions and (ii) identifiability, if dictionaries disentangle synthetic concept mixtures. Across all evaluations, RA-SAEs consistently yield more structured representations while uncovering novel, semantically meaningful concepts in large-scale vision models.

Key facts. Cited by 67 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 90 of its 173 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.

Builds on

90 of 173 references.

References · 90

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  6. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  7. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  8. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  9. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  10. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  11. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  12. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
38 more
  1. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  2. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  3. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  4. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  5. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
  6. 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
  7. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  8. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
  9. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
  10. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  11. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
  12. 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 494
  13. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  14. 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 308
  15. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283
  16. 2021Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating Processcited by 220
  17. 2024Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 193
  18. 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 189
  19. 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 185
  20. 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
  21. 2022Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyondcited by 171
  22. 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 148
  23. 2020Debugging Tests for Model Explanationscited by 146
  24. 2020Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectorscited by 119
  25. 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 116
  26. 2021Counterfactual Explanations Can Be Manipulatedcited by 113
  27. 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 108
  28. 2021HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanationscited by 105
  29. 2021What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methodscited by 98
  30. 2019When Explanations Lie: Why Many Modified BP Attributions Failcited by 92
  31. 2021The effectiveness of feature attribution methods and its correlation with automatic evaluation scorescited by 87
  32. 2019The Incomplete Rosetta Stone Problem: Identifiability Results for Multi-View Nonlinear ICAcited by 86
  33. 2021The Out-of-Distribution Problem in Explainability and Search Methods for Feature Importance Explanationscited by 86
  34. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Featurescited by 86
  35. 2023White-Box Transformers via Sparse Rate Reductioncited by 77
  36. 2023Is This the Subspace You Are Looking for? An Interpretability Illusion for Subspace Activation Patchingcited by 75
  37. 2021Look at the Variance! Efficient Black-box Explanations with Sobol-based Sensitivity Analysiscited by 65
  38. 2024Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary Learningcited by 64

50 most cited of 90 All 90 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 30; 2026: 37.

67 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometrycited by 58
  2. 2025From Flat to Hierarchical: Extracting Sparse Representations with Matching Pursuitcited by 45
  3. 2025Interpreting the linear structure of vision-language model embedding spacescited by 32
  4. 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?cited by 25
  5. 2026Manifold Steering Reveals the Shared Geometry of Neural Network Representation and Behaviorcited by 22
  6. 2025Temporal Sparse Autoencoders: Leveraging the Sequential Nature of Language for Interpretabilitycited by 16
  7. 2025Block-Recurrent Dynamics in Vision Transformerscited by 16
  8. 2025Position: Mechanistic Interpretability Should Prioritize Feature Consistency in SAEscited by 14
  9. 2025Understanding sparse autoencoder scaling in the presence of feature manifoldscited by 11
  10. 2026Cross-Modal Redundancy and the Geometry of Vision-Language Embeddingscited by 9
  11. 2025A Survey on Archetypal Analysiscited by 6
  12. 2025Interpretable and Steerable Concept Bottleneck Sparse Autoencoderscited by 6
38 more
  1. 2025BehaviorBox: Automated Discovery of Fine-Grained Performance Differences Between Language Modelscited by 5
  2. 2025Superposition disentanglement of neural representations reveals hidden alignmentcited by 4
  3. 2025Ensembling Sparse Autoencoderscited by 3
  4. 2025Mechanistic Interpretability with Sparse Autoencoder Neural Operatorscited by 3
  5. 2025Sparse Autoencoders are Topic Modelscited by 3
  6. 2025A Geometric Unification of Concept Learning with Concept Conescited by 3
  7. 2025Discovering Interpretable Biological Concepts in Single-cell RNA-seq Foundation Modelscited by 2
  8. 2026Decomposing multimodal embedding spaces with group-sparse autoencoderscited by 2
  9. 2026Improving Sparse Autoencoder with Dynamic Attentioncited by 2
  10. 2026Toward Identifiable Sparse Autoencoderscited by 2
  11. 2026Evaluating the Interpretability of Sparse Autoencoders with Concept Annotationscited by 2
  12. 2025Measuring the (Un)Faithfulness of Concept-Based Explanationscited by 1
  13. 2025Beyond Interpretability: When, Why, and How Sparse Autoencoders Enable Label-Free Visual Steeringcited by 1
  14. 2025Concept-Based Mechanistic Interpretability Using Structured Knowledge Graphscited by 1
  15. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Make Audio Foundation Models more Explainablecited by 1
  16. 2025FaCT: Faithful Concept Traces for Explaining Neural Network Decisionscited by 1
  17. 2025Enforcing Orderedness to Improve Feature Consistencycited by 1
  18. 2025Interpreto: An Explainability Library for Transformerscited by 1
  19. 2025LouvreSAE: Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable and Controllable Style Transfercited by 1
  20. 2026Transformers converge to invariant algorithmic corescited by 1
  21. 2026VisualScratchpad: Inference-time Visual Concepts Analysis in Vision Language Modelscited by 1
  22. 2026SCoCCA: Multi-modal Sparse Concept Decomposition via Canonical Correlation Analysiscited by 1
  23. 2026From Local to Global to Mechanistic: An iERF-Centered Unified Framework for Interpreting Vision Modelscited by 1
  24. 2026Characterizing Universal Object Representations Across Vision Modelscited by 1
  25. 2026Aligned Training: A Parameter-Free Method to Improve Feature Quality and Stability of Sparse Autoencoders (SAE)cited by 1
  26. 2026A Unifying Framework for Concept-Based Representational Similaritycited by 1
  27. 2026Disentangling Hallucinations: Orthogonal Semantic Projection for Robust Interpretabilitycited by 1
  28. 2025Kronecker Factorization Improves Efficiency and Interpretability of Sparse Autoencoderscited by 0
  29. 2025Representational Difference Explanationscited by 0
  30. 2025MEIcoder: Decoding Visual Stimuli from Neural Activity by Leveraging Most Exciting Inputscited by 0
  31. 2025Equivariant Sparse Autoencoders: Mechanistic Interpretability of Neural Networks on Symmetric Datacited by 0
  32. 2025Features Emerge as Discrete States: The First Application of SAEs to 3D Representationscited by 0
  33. 2025The Deleuzian Representation Hypothesiscited by 0
  34. 2026EVA: Towards a universal model of the immune systemcited by 0
  35. 2026Generalizing Linear Autoencoder Recommenders with Decoupled Expected Quadratic Losscited by 0
  36. 2026Similarity of Neural Network Representations in Superpositioncited by 0
  37. 2026Can Cross-Layer Transcoders Replace Vision Transformer Activations? An Interpretable Perspective on Visioncited by 0
  38. 2026How Far Does a Shared Linear Map Go? Probing Feature-Space Manipulability for Image Editingcited by 0

50 most cited of 67 All 67 (JSON)