Beyond Interpretability: When, Why, and How Sparse Autoencoders Enable Label-Free Visual Steering
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Interpreting vision and multimodal models
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) are increasingly used to interpret foundation models, but their role as an actionable intervention space remains less understood, especially in vision. We study whether sparse visual features can be used not only for post-hoc analysis, but also to steer frozen vision-language models. We introduce Visual Sparse Steering (VS2), a label-free method that trains a top-k SAE on unlabeled activations from a frozen CLIP image encoder and, at test time, constructs an interpretable steering vector by amplifying the input's active sparse features and decoding the induced change. We show that this procedure admits a closed-form decomposition as centroid-deviation steering: each input is moved along its deviation from the SAE-learned centroid. The residual term is controlled exactly by the SAE's per-sample reconstruction error, measured by FVU, yielding an FVU-based residual bound and motivating a reliability gate that falls back to zero-shot CLIP when SAE reconstruction is unreliable. With target-domain SAEs trained on unlabeled CLIP image-encoder activations, VS2 improves zero-shot accuracy across nine image-classification datasets, achieving gains up to +4.12% with less than 0.1% additional inference compute. Finally, a controlled upper-bound study, VS2++, shows that selective amplification of sparse features can yield gains up to +21.44%, exposing a reconstruction-vs-task saliency gap: features salient for reconstruction need not align with features useful for downstream prediction.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Interpreting vision and multimodal models, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 36 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.
Builds on
36 of 56 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Steering CLIP's vision transformer with sparse autoencoders11 Apr
- 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignment6 Feb
- 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptation6 Dec
Other references · 33
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,281
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
- 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,433
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
21 more
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapterscited by 1,026
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
- 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 687
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2021Tip-Adapter: Training-free CLIP-Adapter for Better Vision-Language Modelingcited by 431
- 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 382
- 2023Linearity of Relation Decoding in Transformer Language Modelscited by 200
- 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 160
- 2023Diverse Data Augmentation with Diffusions for Effective Test-time Prompt Tuningcited by 154
- 2022CLIP-Dissect: Automatic Description of Neuron Representations in Deep Vision Networkscited by 147
- 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 119
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Test-time Domain Adaptationcited by 97
- 2024C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersioncited by 83
- 2025Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Modelscited by 73
- 2025The Hidden Life of Tokens: Reducing Hallucination of Large Vision-Language Models via Visual Information Steeringcited by 66
- 2025Steering Large Language Model Activations in Sparse Spacescited by 58
- 2024Decomposing The Dark Matter of Sparse Autoencoderscited by 45
- 2024One-Step is Enough: Sparse Autoencoders for Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 33
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Interpretable and Testable Vision Features via Sparse Autoencoders
- 2026Language Models Can Explain Visual Features via Steering
- 2025Probing the Representational Power of Sparse Autoencoders in Vision Models
- 2024Can sparse autoencoders be used to decompose and interpret steering vectors?
- 2025Rethinking Sparse Autoencoders: Select-and-Project for Fairness and Control from Encoder Features Alone
- 2026Steering Vision-Language Models with Joint Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025Interpretable and Steerable Concept Bottleneck Sparse Autoencoders
- 2024Analyzing (In)Abilities of SAEs via Formal Languages