Improving Sparse Autoencoder with Dynamic Attention
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a promising technique for interpreting activations in foundation models by disentangling features into a sparse set of concepts. However, identifying the optimal level of sparsity for each neuron remains challenging in practice: excessive sparsity can lead to poor reconstruction, whereas insufficient sparsity may harm interpretability. While existing activation functions such as ReLU and TopK provide certain sparsity guarantees, they typically require additional sparsity regularization or cherry-picked hyperparameters. We show in this paper that dynamically sparse attention mechanisms using sparsemax can bridge this trade-off, due to their ability to determine the activation numbers in a data-dependent manner. Specifically, we first explore a new class of SAEs based on the cross-attention architecture with the latent features as queries and the learnable dictionary as the key and value matrices. To encourage sparse pattern learning, we employ a sparsemax-based attention strategy that automatically infers a sparse set of elements according to the complexity of each neuron, resulting in a more flexible and general activation function. Through comprehensive evaluation and visualization, we show that our approach successfully achieves lower reconstruction loss while producing high-quality concepts, particularly in top-n classification tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2026.
Builds on
46 of 66 references.
References · 46
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 5,931
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
- 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,115
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
- 2020Rethinking Attention with Performerscited by 1,584
- 2019Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformerscited by 1,523
34 more
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
- 2016From Softmax to Sparsemax: A Sparse Model of Attention and Multi-Label Classificationcited by 337
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
- 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 171
- 2019Sparse Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 167
- 2019Adaptively Sparse Transformerscited by 154
- 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoderscited by 126
- 2024SeerAttention: Learning Intrinsic Sparse Attention in Your LLMscited by 121
- 2024A Practical Review of Mechanistic Interpretability for Transformer-Based Language Modelscited by 113
- 2025SAeUron: Interpretable Concept Unlearning in Diffusion Models with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 75
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Modelscited by 70
- 2025Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Modelscited by 67
- 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptationcited by 66
- 2021Memory-efficient Transformers via Top-k Attentioncited by 59
- 2025Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometrycited by 58
- 2024Measuring Progress in Dictionary Learning for Language Model Interpretability with Board Game Modelscited by 51
- 2024Efficient Dictionary Learning with Switch Sparse Autoencoderscited by 38
- 2022Representing Mixtures of Word Embeddings with Mixtures of Topic Embeddingscited by 36
- 2023Tuning Multi-mode Token-level Prompt Alignment across Modalitiescited by 26
- 2024Enhancing Neural Network Interpretability with Feature-Aligned Sparse Autoencoderscited by 25
- 2021Sawtooth Factorial Topic Embeddings Guided Gamma Belief Networkcited by 23
- 2024Large Multi-modal Models Can Interpret Features in Large Multi-modal Modelscited by 23
- 2023PatchCT: Aligning Patch Set and Label Set with Conditional Transport for Multi-Label Image Classificationcited by 21
- 2021Predicting Attention Sparsity in Transformerscited by 13
- 2023Patch-Prompt Aligned Bayesian Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 12
- 2024Instruction Tuning-free Visual Token Complement for Multimodal LLMscited by 12
- 2025AdaSplash: Adaptive Sparse Flash Attentioncited by 12
- 2021TopicNet: Semantic Graph-Guided Topic Discoverycited by 9
- 2023Interpretability-Aware Vision Transformercited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.