Correcting Influence: Unboxing LLM Outputs with Orthogonal Latent Spaces
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A critical step for reliable large language models (LLMs) use in healthcare is to attribute predictions to their training data, akin to a medical case study. This requires token-level precision: pinpointing not just which training examples influence a decision, but which tokens within them are responsible. While influence functions offer a principled framework for this, prior work is restricted to autoregressive settings and relies on an implicit assumption of token independence, rendering their identified influences unreliable. We introduce a flexible framework that infers token-level influence through a latent mediation approach for general prediction tasks. Our method attaches sparse autoencoders to any layer of a pretrained LLM to learn a basis of approximately independent latent features. Unlike prior methods where influence decomposes additively across tokens, influence computed over latent features is inherently non-decomposable. To address this, we introduce a novel method using Jacobian-vector products. Token-level influence is obtained by propagating latent attributions back to the input space via token activation patterns. We scale our approach using efficient inverse-Hessian approximations. Experiments on medical benchmarks show our approach identifies sparse, interpretable sets of tokens that jointly influence predictions. Our framework enhances trust and enables model auditing, generalizing to high-stakes domain requiring transparent and accountable decisions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 61 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.
Builds on
61 of 90 references.
References · 61
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
38 more
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,081
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
- 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 930
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
- 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
- 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
- 2021Multimodal Few-Shot Learning with Frozen Language Modelscited by 657
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 553
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
- 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 417
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 412
- 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 401
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 328
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 311
- 2023In-Context Learning Creates Task Vectorscited by 302
- 2023Function Vectors in Large Language Modelscited by 292
- 2023Role-Play with Large Language Modelscited by 290
- 2023MedAlpaca -- An Open-Source Collection of Medical Conversational AI Models and Training Datacited by 282
- 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
- 2021Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representationscited by 203
- 2023Linearity of Relation Decoding in Transformer Language Modelscited by 190
- 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 186
- 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 171
- 2024The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 151
- 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoderscited by 126
- 2019Counterfactual Off-Policy Evaluation with Gumbel-Max Structural Causal Modelscited by 114
- 2022Disentangled Representation Learningcited by 111
- 2022Impossibility Theorems for Feature Attributioncited by 78
- 2022Polysemanticity and Capacity in Neural Networkscited by 74
- 2023Copy Suppression: Comprehensively Understanding an Attention Headcited by 73
50 most cited of 61 All 61 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.