mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Can Cross-Layer Transcoders Replace Vision Transformer Activations? An Interpretable Perspective on Vision

arXiv 2604.13304 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Interpreting vision and multimodal models

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding the internal activations of Vision Transformers (ViTs) is critical for building interpretable and trustworthy models. While Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have been used to extract human-interpretable features, they operate on individual layers and fail to capture the cross-layer computational structure of Transformers, as well as the relative significance of each layer in forming the last-layer representation. Alternatively, we introduce the adoption of Cross-Layer Transcoders (CLTs) as reliable, sparse, and depth-aware proxy models for MLP blocks in ViTs. CLTs use an encoder-decoder scheme to reconstruct each post-MLP activation from learned sparse embeddings of preceding layers, yielding a linear decomposition that transforms the final representation of ViTs from an opaque embedding into an additive, layer-resolved construction that enables faithful attribution and process-level interpretability. We train CLTs on CLIP ViT-B/32 and ViT-B/16 across CIFAR-100, COCO, and ImageNet-100. We show that CLTs achieve high reconstruction fidelity with post-MLP activations while preserving and even improving, in some cases, CLIP zero-shot classification accuracy. In terms of interpretability, we show that the cross-layer contribution scores provide faithful attribution, revealing that the final representation is concentrated in a smaller set of dominant layer-wise terms whose removal degrades performance and whose retention largely preserves it. These results showcase the significance of adopting CLTs as an alternative interpretable proxy of ViTs in the vision domain.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Interpreting vision and multimodal models, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.

Builds on

26 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Steering CLIP's vision transformer with sparse autoencoders11 Apr
  2. 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignment6 Feb
  3. 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptation6 Dec

Other references · 23

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,588
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,278
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,979
  4. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,195
  5. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,827
  6. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,490
  7. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,360
  8. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,282
  9. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,391
  10. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 950
  11. 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 711
  12. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 707
11 more
  1. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 544
  2. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 423
  3. 2024The Faiss librarycited by 371
  4. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 292
  5. 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 193
  6. 2022CLIP-Dissect: Automatic Description of Neuron Representations in Deep Vision Networkscited by 146
  7. 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 119
  8. 2025Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Modelscited by 72
  9. 2025Overcoming Sparsity Artifacts in Crosscoders to Interpret Chat-Tuningcited by 32
  10. 2024One-Step is Enough: Sparse Autoencoders for Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 31
  11. 2025AbsTopK: Rethinking Sparse Autoencoders For Bidirectional Featurescited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Interpreting vision transformers via residual replacement model
  2. 2026Inside the Visual Mind: Neuroscience-Motivated Concept Circuits for Interpreting and Steering Vision Transformers
  3. 2026SpIn-ViT: Designing a Sparsity-Induced Vision Transformer That Is Mechanistically Interpretable
  4. 2025Interpretable and Testable Vision Features via Sparse Autoencoders
  5. 2026Transcoders Trace Visual Grounding and Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models
  6. 2023Objectives Matter: Understanding the Impact of Self-Supervised Objectives on Vision Transformer Representations
  7. 2026Sparse but not Simpler: A Multi-Level Interpretability Analysis of Vision Transformers
  8. 2026Decoding the Functional Roles of Register and High-Norm Patch Tokens in Vision Transformers