mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpretability Without Tradeoffs: Disentangling Polysemanticity At Equal Predictive Performance

arXiv 2605.31304 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are widely used, but interpreting what they actually learn remains difficult. A major obstacle is that individual neurons often encode multiple unrelated concepts, obscuring the decision process of the network. While prior work, such as sparse autoencoders, can separate these mixed signals into more meaningful, "monosemantic" features, this typically requires altering the model in ways that can degrade downstream performance. To overcome this, we introduce ELUDe (explicit, lossless, unsupervised disentanglement), a method for improving the interpretability of DNNs while preserving their functional equivalence. ELUDe breaks latent representations into clear, inspectable sub-units that behave like interpretable features, while guaranteeing that the model's outputs remain exactly the same. It requires no explicit training, no labels, and can be applied to pretrained models. ELUDe works by reorganizing how information flows between layers, re-routing concept-specific contributions while preserving the original computation by construction. Across several vision models, including DINOv2 and supervised ViT-B/16, ELUDe improves interpretability, keeps downstream accuracy unchanged, runs efficiently, and supports practical uses such as steering model representations. In short, ELUDe offers interpretability (almost) without a tradeoff: clearer, scalable, and actionable model insights with no loss in performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 65 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

65 of 77 references.

References · 65

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  6. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  7. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  8. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  9. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  10. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  11. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
  12. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,719
38 more
  1. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  2. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
  3. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  4. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
  5. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
  6. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  7. 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,188
  8. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  9. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  10. 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 922
  11. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 737
  12. 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 712
  13. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
  14. 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 569
  15. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  16. 2019Dreaming to Distill: Data-free Knowledge Transfer via DeepInversioncited by 423
  17. 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 422
  18. 2024A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 357
  19. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 300
  20. 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoderscited by 218
  21. 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 215
  22. 2023To Generate or Not? Safety-Driven Unlearned Diffusion Models Are Still Easy To Generate Unsafe Images ... For Nowcited by 210
  23. 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 200
  24. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 191
  25. 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 184
  26. 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 179
  27. 2022CLIP-Dissect: Automatic Description of Neuron Representations in Deep Vision Networkscited by 147
  28. 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 143
  29. 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoderscited by 130
  30. 2024AttnLRP: Attention-Aware Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation for Transformerscited by 120
  31. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Featurescited by 93
  32. 2022B-cos Networks: Alignment is All We Need for Interpretabilitycited by 88
  33. 2022Polysemanticity and Capacity in Neural Networkscited by 77
  34. 2025Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Modelscited by 73
  35. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Modelscited by 71
  36. 2022ProtoPFormer: Concentrating on Prototypical Parts in Vision Transformers for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 63
  37. 2025Interpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoderscited by 60
  38. 2025From Flat to Hierarchical: Extracting Sparse Representations with Matching Pursuitcited by 49

50 most cited of 65 All 65 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025From Isolation to Entanglement: When Do Interpretability Methods Identify and Disentangle Known Concepts?
  2. 2025From superposition to sparse codes: interpretable representations in neural networks
  3. 2024Decompose the model: Mechanistic interpretability in image models with Generalized Integrated Gradients (GIG)
  4. 2023Identifying Interpretable Visual Features in Artificial and Biological Neural Systems
  5. 2026Sparse but not Simpler: A Multi-Level Interpretability Analysis of Vision Transformers
  6. 2026Clarity: The Flexibility-Interpretability Trade-Off in Sparsity-aware Concept Bottleneck Models
  7. 2026Understanding Empirical Unlearning with Combinatorial Interpretability
  8. 2026The Polytopal Neural Network