mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generalizing Linear Autoencoder Recommenders with Decoupled Expected Quadratic Loss

arXiv 2603.07402 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Linear autoencoders (LAEs) have gained increasing popularity in recommender systems due to their simplicity and strong empirical performance. Most LAE models, including the Emphasized Denoising Linear Autoencoder (EDLAE) introduced by (Steck, 2020), use quadratic loss during training. However, the original EDLAE only provides closed-form solutions for the hyperparameter choice b = 0, which limits its capacity. In this work, we generalize EDLAE objective into a Decoupled Expected Quadratic Loss (DEQL). We show that DEQL simplifies the process of deriving EDLAE solutions and reveals solutions in a broader hyperparameter range b > 0, which were not derived in Steck's original paper. Additionally, we propose an efficient algorithm based on Miller's matrix inverse theorem to ensure the computational tractability for the b > 0 case. Empirical results on benchmark datasets show that the b > 0 solutions provided by DEQL outperform the b = 0 EDLAE baseline, demonstrating that DEQL expands the solution space and enables the discovery of models with better testing performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2026.

Builds on

35 of 66 references.

References · 35

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  4. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
  5. 2020LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendationcited by 1,134
  6. 2018Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 1,133
  7. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,108
  8. 2016Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 745
  9. 2017DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Predictioncited by 673
  10. 2019Neural Graph Collaborative Filteringcited by 660
  11. 2018Meta-learning with differentiable closed-form solverscited by 395
  12. 2017Deep & Cross Network for Ad Click Predictionscited by 392
23 more
  1. 2018GAIN: Missing Data Imputation using Generative Adversarial Netscited by 349
  2. 2018Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filteringcited by 308
  3. 2020Self-supervised Graph Learning for Recommendationcited by 305
  4. 2019Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approachescited by 181
  5. 2020Disentangled Graph Collaborative Filteringcited by 118
  6. 2019Embarrassingly Shallow Autoencoders for Sparse Datacited by 93
  7. 2025Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Modelscited by 67
  8. 2019A Troubling Analysis of Reproducibility and Progress in Recommender Systems Researchcited by 65
  9. 2021SimpleX: A Simple and Strong Baseline for Collaborative Filteringcited by 65
  10. 2022Towards Representation Alignment and Uniformity in Collaborative Filteringcited by 57
  11. 2023Loss Functions and Metrics in Deep Learningcited by 42
  12. 2022On the Effectiveness of Sampled Softmax Loss for Item Recommendationcited by 39
  13. 2020Contrastive Learning for Debiased Candidate Generation in Large-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 38
  14. 2021Contrastive Learning for Recommender Systemcited by 16
  15. 2024Sparse Autoencoders Reveal Temporal Difference Learning in Large Language Modelscited by 15
  16. 2021Trust your neighbors: A comprehensive survey of neighborhood-based methods for recommender systemscited by 8
  17. 2023It's Enough: Relaxing Diagonal Constraints in Linear Autoencoders for Recommendationcited by 7
  18. 2023Revisiting Recommendation Loss Functions through Contrastive Learning (Technical Report)cited by 5
  19. 2023BSL: Understanding and Improving Softmax Loss for Recommendationcited by 5
  20. 2024MARec: Metadata Alignment for cold-start Recommendationcited by 3
  21. 2025PAC-Bayes Bounds for Multivariate Linear Regression and Linear Autoencoderscited by 3
  22. 2023Proxy-based Item Representation for Attribute and Context-aware Recommendationcited by 2
  23. 2023The Time Complexity of Fully Sparse Matrix Multiplicationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.