mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Implicit Neural Representation and Geometric Rendering in Real-Time RGB-D SLAM

arXiv 2403.19473 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2024cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Implicit neural representation (INR), in combination with geometric rendering, has recently been employed in real-time dense RGB-D SLAM. Despite active research endeavors being made, there lacks a unified protocol for fair evaluation, impeding the evolution of this area. In this work, we establish, to our knowledge, the first open-source benchmark framework to evaluate the performance of a wide spectrum of commonly used INRs and rendering functions for mapping and localization. The goal of our benchmark is to 1) gain an intuition of how different INRs and rendering functions impact mapping and localization and 2) establish a unified evaluation protocol w.r.t. the design choices that may impact the mapping and localization. With the framework, we conduct a large suite of experiments, offering various insights in choosing the INRs and geometric rendering functions: for example, the dense feature grid outperforms other INRs (e.g. tri-plane and hash grid), even when geometric and color features are jointly encoded for memory efficiency. To extend the findings into the practical scenario, a hybrid encoding strategy is proposed to bring the best of the accuracy and completion from the grid-based and decomposition-based INRs. We further propose explicit hybrid encoding for high-fidelity dense grid mapping to comply with the RGB-D SLAM system that puts the premise on robustness and computation efficiency.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2024.

Builds on

45 of 59 references.

References · 45

  1. 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,141
  2. 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,698
  3. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,088
  4. 2021NeuS: Learning Neural Implicit Surfaces by Volume Rendering for Multi-view Reconstructioncited by 1,701
  5. 2021Efficient Geometry-aware 3D Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,204
  6. 2021Volume Rendering of Neural Implicit Surfacescited by 990
  7. 2015ORB-SLAM: a Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM Systemcited by 983
  8. 2019The Replica Dataset: A Digital Replica of Indoor Spacescited by 885
  9. 2020ORB-SLAM3: An Accurate Open-Source Library for Visual, Visual-Inertial and Multi-Map SLAMcited by 862
  10. 2016ORB-SLAM2: an Open-Source SLAM System for Monocular, Stereo and RGB-D Camerascited by 801
  11. 2021UNISURF: Unifying Neural Implicit Surfaces and Radiance Fields for Multi-View Reconstructioncited by 643
  12. 2021BARF: Bundle-Adjusting Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 641
33 more
  1. 2021NICE-SLAM: Neural Implicit Scalable Encoding for SLAMcited by 586
  2. 2022Point-NeRF: Point-based Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 503
  3. 2021iMAP: Implicit Mapping and Positioning in Real-Timecited by 476
  4. 2020INeRF: Inverting Neural Radiance Fields for Pose Estimationcited by 381
  5. 2021Neural RGB-D Surface Reconstructioncited by 312
  6. 2023GS-SLAM: Dense Visual SLAM with 3D Gaussian Splattingcited by 278
  7. 2022NoPe-NeRF: Optimising Neural Radiance Field with No Pose Priorcited by 235
  8. 2021Self-Calibrating Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 204
  9. 2022NeRF-SLAM: Real-Time Dense Monocular SLAM with Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 188
  10. 2023Co-SLAM: Joint Coordinate and Sparse Parametric Encodings for Neural Real-Time SLAMcited by 183
  11. 2023NICER-SLAM: Neural Implicit Scene Encoding for RGB SLAMcited by 162
  12. 2023Point-SLAM: Dense Neural Point Cloud-based SLAMcited by 160
  13. 2022ESLAM: Efficient Dense SLAM System Based on Hybrid Representation of Signed Distance Fieldscited by 158
  14. 2022Vox-Fusion: Dense Tracking and Mapping with Voxel-based Neural Implicit Representationcited by 149
  15. 2023GO-SLAM: Global Optimization for Consistent 3D Instant Reconstructioncited by 132
  16. 2016BundleFusion: Real-time Globally Consistent 3D Reconstruction using On-the-fly Surface Re-integrationcited by 116
  17. 2022Orbeez-SLAM: A Real-time Monocular Visual SLAM with ORB Features and NeRF-realized Mappingcited by 79
  18. 2023vMAP: Vectorised Object Mapping for Neural Field SLAMcited by 67
  19. 2023DBARF: Deep Bundle-Adjusting Generalizable Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 60
  20. 2022SHINE-Mapping: Large-Scale 3D Mapping Using Sparse Hierarchical Implicit Neural Representationscited by 44
  21. 2023Dense RGB SLAM with Neural Implicit Mapscited by 42
  22. 2023NeRF-LOAM: Neural Implicit Representation for Large-Scale Incremental LiDAR Odometry and Mappingcited by 41
  23. 2023CP-SLAM: Collaborative Neural Point-based SLAM Systemcited by 32
  24. 2023HI-SLAM: Monocular Real-time Dense Mapping with Hybrid Implicit Fieldscited by 31
  25. 2021Differentiable Surface Rendering via Non-Differentiable Samplingcited by 28
  26. 2023Neural Implicit Dense Semantic SLAMcited by 26
  27. 2023MIPS-Fusion: Multi-Implicit-Submaps for Scalable and Robust Online Neural RGB-D Reconstructioncited by 24
  28. 2023H2-Mapping: Real-time Dense Mapping Using Hierarchical Hybrid Representationcited by 23
  29. 2023NEWTON: Neural View-Centric Mapping for On-the-Fly Large-Scale SLAMcited by 17
  30. 2023FMapping: Factorized Efficient Neural Field Mapping for Real-Time Dense RGB SLAMcited by 6
  31. 2024Hi-Map: Hierarchical Factorized Radiance Field for High-Fidelity Monocular Dense Mappingcited by 6
  32. 2023Uni-Fusion: Universal Continuous Mappingcited by 5
  33. 2017Robust Keyframe-based Dense SLAM with an RGB-D Cameracited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4.

6 papers.