mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hard No-Box Adversarial Attack on Skeleton-Based Human Action Recognition with Skeleton-Motion-Informed Gradient

arXiv 2308.05681 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2023cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, methods for skeleton-based human activity recognition have been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks. However, these attack methods require either the full knowledge of the victim (i.e. white-box attacks), access to training data (i.e. transfer-based attacks) or frequent model queries (i.e. black-box attacks). All their requirements are highly restrictive, raising the question of how detrimental the vulnerability is. In this paper, we show that the vulnerability indeed exists. To this end, we consider a new attack task: the attacker has no access to the victim model or the training data or labels, where we coin the term hard no-box attack. Specifically, we first learn a motion manifold where we define an adversarial loss to compute a new gradient for the attack, named skeleton-motion-informed (SMI) gradient. Our gradient contains information of the motion dynamics, which is different from existing gradient-based attack methods that compute the loss gradient assuming each dimension in the data is independent. The SMI gradient can augment many gradient-based attack methods, leading to a new family of no-box attack methods. Extensive evaluation and comparison show that our method imposes a real threat to existing classifiers. They also show that the SMI gradient improves the transferability and imperceptibility of adversarial samples in both no-box and transfer-based black-box settings.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2023.

Builds on

37 of 47 references.

References · 37

  1. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  5. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  6. 2018Spatial Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognitioncited by 1,209
  7. 2016NTU RGB+D: A Large Scale Dataset for 3D Human Activity Analysiscited by 686
  8. 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 599
  9. 2019NTU RGB+D 120: A Large-Scale Benchmark for 3D Human Activity Understandingcited by 533
  10. 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 462
  11. 2019Hidden Trigger Backdoor Attackscited by 371
  12. 2020Disentangling and Unifying Graph Convolutions for Skeleton-Based Action Recognitioncited by 343
25 more
  1. 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 245
  2. 2019Actional-Structural Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-based Action Recognitioncited by 228
  3. 2019Semantics-Guided Neural Networks for Efficient Skeleton-Based Human Action Recognitioncited by 135
  4. 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A surveycited by 127
  5. 2016An End-to-End Spatio-Temporal Attention Model for Human Action Recognition from Skeleton Datacited by 126
  6. 2017A New Representation of Skeleton Sequences for 3D Action Recognitioncited by 126
  7. 2020Better Aggregation in Test-Time Augmentationcited by 122
  8. 2020MS2L: Multi-Task Self-Supervised Learning for Skeleton Based Action Recognitioncited by 92
  9. 2017Interpretable 3D Human Action Analysis with Temporal Convolutional Networkscited by 89
  10. 2019ClusterFit: Improving Generalization of Visual Representationscited by 82
  11. 2021When Does Contrastive Learning Preserve Adversarial Robustness from Pretraining to Finetuning?cited by 77
  12. 2021Skeleton-Contrastive 3D Action Representation Learningcited by 76
  13. 2023On the Design Fundamentals of Diffusion Models: A Surveycited by 60
  14. 2020A Survey on 3D Skeleton-Based Action Recognition Using Learning Methodcited by 47
  15. 2019Spatio-temporal Manifold Learning for Human Motions via Long-horizon Modelingcited by 32
  16. 2019Adversarial Attack on Skeleton-based Human Action Recognitioncited by 32
  17. 2020Practical No-box Adversarial Attacks against DNNscited by 32
  18. 2022Hierarchical Consistent Contrastive Learning for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition with Growing Augmentationscited by 31
  19. 2022Real-time Controllable Motion Transition for Characterscited by 29
  20. 2021BASAR:Black-box Attack on Skeletal Action Recognitioncited by 26
  21. 2023Self-supervised Action Representation Learning from Partial Spatio-Temporal Skeleton Sequencescited by 25
  22. 2021Understanding the Robustness of Skeleton-based Action Recognition under Adversarial Attackcited by 24
  23. 2021Adversarial Bone Length Attack on Action Recognitioncited by 10
  24. 2022Unifying Human Motion Synthesis and Style Transfer with Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 10
  25. 2022Defending Black-box Skeleton-based Human Activity Classifierscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

10 papers.