mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Boosting Adversarial Transferability for Skeleton-based Action Recognition via Exploring the Model Posterior Space

arXiv 2407.08572 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2024cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Skeletal motion plays a pivotal role in human activity recognition (HAR). Recently, attack methods have been proposed to identify the universal vulnerability of skeleton-based HAR(S-HAR). However, the research of adversarial transferability on S-HAR is largely missing. More importantly, existing attacks all struggle in transfer across unknown S-HAR models. We observed that the key reason is that the loss landscape of the action recognizers is rugged and sharp. Given the established correlation in prior studies~citeqin2022boosting,wu2020towards between loss landscape and adversarial transferability, we assume and empirically validate that smoothing the loss landscape could potentially improve adversarial transferability on S-HAR. This is achieved by proposing a new post-train Dual Bayesian strategy, which can effectively explore the model posterior space for a collection of surrogates without the need for re-training. Furthermore, to craft adversarial examples along the motion manifold, we incorporate the attack gradient with information of the motion dynamics in a Bayesian manner. Evaluated on benchmark datasets, e.g. HDM05 and NTU 60, the average transfer success rate can reach as high as 35.9% and 45.5% respectively. In comparison, current state-of-the-art skeletal attacks achieve only 3.6% and 9.8%. The high adversarial transferability remains consistent across various surrogate, victim, and even defense models. Through a comprehensive analysis of the results, we provide insights on what surrogates are more likely to exhibit transferability, to shed light on future research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2024.

Builds on

32 of 45 references.

References · 32

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  4. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  5. 2018Spatial Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognitioncited by 1,199
  6. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
  7. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  8. 2016NTU RGB+D: A Large Scale Dataset for 3D Human Activity Analysiscited by 683
  9. 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
  10. 2016Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attackscited by 530
  11. 2019NTU RGB+D 120: A Large-Scale Benchmark for 3D Human Activity Understandingcited by 530
  12. 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 459
20 more
  1. 2019Nesterov Accelerated Gradient and Scale Invariance for Adversarial Attackscited by 352
  2. 2020Disentangling and Unifying Graph Convolutions for Skeleton-Based Action Recognitioncited by 339
  3. 2021Channel-wise Topology Refinement Graph Convolution for Skeleton-Based Action Recognitioncited by 317
  4. 2021Stochastic Variance Reduced Ensemble Adversarial Attack for Boosting the Adversarial Transferabilitycited by 84
  5. 2022Boosting the Transferability of Adversarial Attacks with Reverse Adversarial Perturbationcited by 67
  6. 2023Learning Discriminative Representations for Skeleton Based Action Recognitioncited by 62
  7. 2020A Survey on 3D Skeleton-Based Action Recognition Using Learning Methodcited by 46
  8. 2021A Little Robustness Goes a Long Way: Leveraging Robust Features for Targeted Transfer Attackscited by 33
  9. 2019Adversarial Attack on Skeleton-based Human Action Recognitioncited by 32
  10. 2023Making Substitute Models More Bayesian Can Enhance Transferability of Adversarial Examplescited by 32
  11. 2023Why Does Little Robustness Help? A Further Step Towards Understanding Adversarial Transferabilitycited by 32
  12. 2022Real-time Controllable Motion Transition for Characterscited by 29
  13. 2021BASAR:Black-box Attack on Skeletal Action Recognitioncited by 25
  14. 2021Understanding the Robustness of Skeleton-based Action Recognition under Adversarial Attackcited by 23
  15. 2021Adversarial Bone Length Attack on Action Recognitioncited by 10
  16. 2023Hard No-Box Adversarial Attack on Skeleton-Based Human Action Recognition with Skeleton-Motion-Informed Gradientcited by 10
  17. 2022Defending Black-box Skeleton-based Human Activity Classifierscited by 8
  18. 2022Understanding the Vulnerability of Skeleton-based Human Activity Recognition via Black-box Attackcited by 7
  19. 2023Skeleton-based Human Action Recognition via Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)cited by 4
  20. 2023Fourier Analysis on Robustness of Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Skeleton-based Action Recognitioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.