mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrapping

arXiv 2012.13995 ↗First posted 27 Dec 2020cs.CR cs.AI cs.DCcited by 346

Not on the map. Why?

Cited by 28 in LLM safety and security, but placed by its own abstract, which didn’t fit.

Abstract (arXiv)

Byzantine-robust federated learning aims to enable a service provider to learn an accurate global model when a bounded number of clients are malicious. The key idea of existing Byzantine-robust federated learning methods is that the service provider performs statistical analysis among the clients' local model updates and removes suspicious ones, before aggregating them to update the global model. However, malicious clients can still corrupt the global models in these methods via sending carefully crafted local model updates to the service provider. The fundamental reason is that there is no root of trust in existing federated learning methods. In this work, we bridge the gap via proposing FLTrust, a new federated learning method in which the service provider itself bootstraps trust. In particular, the service provider itself collects a clean small training dataset (called root dataset) for the learning task and the service provider maintains a model (called server model) based on it to bootstrap trust. In each iteration, the service provider first assigns a trust score to each local model update from the clients, where a local model update has a lower trust score if its direction deviates more from the direction of the server model update. Then, the service provider normalizes the magnitudes of the local model updates such that they lie in the same hyper-sphere as the server model update in the vector space. Our normalization limits the impact of malicious local model updates with large magnitudes. Finally, the service provider computes the average of the normalized local model updates weighted by their trust scores as a global model update, which is used to update the global model. Our extensive evaluations on six datasets from different domains show that our FLTrust is secure against both existing attacks and strong adaptive attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 346 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 14; 2022: 35; 2023: 52; 2024: 79; 2025: 95; 2026: 71.

346 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022FLDetector: Defending Federated Learning Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Detecting Malicious Clientscited by 125
  2. 2023Federated Learning for Generalization, Robustness, Fairness: A Survey and Benchmarkcited by 99
  3. 2022MPAF: Model Poisoning Attacks to Federated Learning based on Fake Clientscited by 68
  4. 2023A Survey on Federated Unlearning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 63
  5. 2022FedRecover: Recovering from Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning using Historical Informationcited by 58
  6. 2022"Real Attackers Don't Compute Gradients": Bridging the Gap Between Adversarial ML Research and Practicecited by 56
  7. 2024Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 48
  8. 2021Challenges and Approaches for Mitigating Byzantine Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 47
  9. 2021SparseFed: Mitigating Model Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning with Sparsificationcited by 46
  10. 2022FLIP: A Provable Defense Framework for Backdoor Mitigation in Federated Learningcited by 37
  11. 2024Advances and Open Challenges in Federated Foundation Modelscited by 36
  12. 2025Practical Poisoning Attacks against Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 36
38 more
  1. 2023A Survey on ChatGPT: AI-Generated Contents, Challenges, and Solutionscited by 35
  2. 2023An Experimental Study of Byzantine-Robust Aggregation Schemes in Federated Learningcited by 32
  3. 2024Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 31
  4. 2021Byzantine-robust Federated Learning through Collaborative Malicious Gradient Filteringcited by 30
  5. 2022FLCert: Provably Secure Federated Learning against Poisoning Attackscited by 30
  6. 2022AFLGuard: Byzantine-robust Asynchronous Federated Learningcited by 29
  7. 2025Traceback of Poisoning Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 28
  8. 2022CrowdGuard: Federated Backdoor Detection in Federated Learningcited by 27
  9. 2023FreqFed: A Frequency Analysis-Based Approach for Mitigating Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 27
  10. 2023A Survey of Trustworthy Federated Learning with Perspectives on Security, Robustness, and Privacycited by 24
  11. 2023BayBFed: Bayesian Backdoor Defense for Federated Learningcited by 23
  12. 2023Multi-metrics adaptively identifies backdoors in Federated learningcited by 23
  13. 2023Over-The-Air Federated Learning: Status Quo, Open Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 21
  14. 2025Exploring and Mitigating Adversarial Manipulation of Voting-Based Leaderboardscited by 20
  15. 2024Advances in APPFL: A Comprehensive and Extensible Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 19
  16. 2023Practical Differentially Private and Byzantine-resilient Federated Learningcited by 18
  17. 2023Backdoor Federated Learning by Poisoning Backdoor-Critical Layerscited by 18
  18. 2023Zero-Knowledge Proof-based Verifiable Decentralized Machine Learning in Communication Network: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 18
  19. 2023FedGT: Identification of Malicious Clients in Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 16
  20. 2023A Survey for Federated Learning Evaluations: Goals and Measurescited by 16
  21. 2021A Systematic Survey of Blockchained Federated Learningcited by 15
  22. 2022More is Better (Mostly): On the Backdoor Attacks in Federated Graph Neural Networkscited by 15
  23. 2023Accelerating Hybrid Federated Learning Convergence under Partial Participationcited by 15
  24. 2023FLShield: A Validation Based Federated Learning Framework to Defend Against Poisoning Attackscited by 15
  25. 2024Poisoning Federated Recommender Systems with Fake Userscited by 15
  26. 2024Threats and Defenses in Federated Learning Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Survey and Challengescited by 15
  27. 2024Achieving Byzantine-Resilient Federated Learning via Layer-Adaptive Sparsified Model Aggregationcited by 15
  28. 2025Do We Really Need to Design New Byzantine-robust Aggregation Rules?cited by 15
  29. 2024Trustworthy Distributed AI Systems: Robustness, Privacy, and Governancecited by 14
  30. 2024GI-NAS: Boosting Gradient Inversion Attacks Through Adaptive Neural Architecture Searchcited by 14
  31. 2024Synergizing Foundation Models and Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 14
  32. 2025Detecting Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning via Direction Alignment Inspectioncited by 13
  33. 2021Auto-weighted Robust Federated Learning with Corrupted Data Sourcescited by 12
  34. 2021Data Poisoning Attacks and Defenses to Crowdsourcing Systemscited by 12
  35. 2022NET-FLEET: Achieving Linear Convergence Speedup for Fully Decentralized Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Datacited by 12
  36. 2022Backdoor Attack and Defense in Federated Generative Adversarial Network-based Medical Image Synthesiscited by 12
  37. 2024Robust Federated Learning Mitigates Client-side Training Data Distribution Inference Attackscited by 11
  38. 2023Denial-of-Service or Fine-Grained Control: Towards Flexible Model Poisoning Attacks on Federated Learningcited by 10

50 most cited of 346 All 346 (JSON)