mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SWB-DM: A Calibrated Sliced-Wasserstein-Barycenter Aggregator with Delayed-Momentum Caching for Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning under Partial Participation

arXiv 2609.16099 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.CR cs.DCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robust aggregation methods for federated learning quietly rest on a fragile assumption: that whoever shows up in a given round is a fair sample of the full population. In practice, they rarely are. When only a handful of clients participate per round, even a modest fraction of adversaries can dominate that sample and silently invalidate the finite-sample guarantees that coordinate-wise median, Krum, Bulyan, and trimmed mean all depend on. We introduce SWB-DM to address this directly. SWB treats each slice of a client update as a one-dimensional distribution, computes a trimmed Wasserstein barycenter across clients, and recovers coordinate identity via a medoid-based gauge-fixing step -- a heuristic we developed and do not claim it belongs to standard optimal-transport theory. DeMoA-style delayed momentum then caches updates across the full client population each round, decoupling robustness from whoever happened to be sampled. Trim ratio calibration is not cosmetic: under-trimming causes collapse at corruption levels a properly calibrated model survives. Across 448 CIFAR-10 configurations, plus CIFAR-100, FEMNIST, and a 500-client scalability run, we find several mechanistically distinct failure modes. Even-sample coordinate-wise median degrades to a deterministic wrong answer. Krum silently violates its own n greater than 2f+2 precondition and diverges without warning. Bulyan's n greater than or equal to 4f+3 threshold produces a sharp pass/fail boundary. On attacks, IPM defeats order-statistic defenses -- including SWB -- more reliably than ALIE, confirmed through delta-space measurements against a convergence bound. SWB-DM's cache carries a real warm-up cost, but extending all baselines to the same round budget shows its CIFAR-10 gains are disproportionately large. On CIFAR-100, FLTrust benefits more -- for reasons entirely unrelated to caching.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

Builds on

8 of 12 references.

References · 8

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
  3. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
  4. 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 329
  5. 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 288
  6. 2019Fall of Empires: Breaking Byzantine-tolerant SGD by Inner Product Manipulationcited by 141
  7. 2019Mean estimation and regression under heavy-tailed distributions--a surveycited by 136
  8. 2025Delayed Momentum Aggregation: Communication-efficient Byzantine-robust Federated Learning with Partial Participationcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.