FL-OA: A Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning Framework with Outsourced Auditing for Intelligent Devices
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) enables multiple intelligent devices to collaboratively train a high-accuracy model without sharing raw data. However, due to its distributed nature, FL is vulnerable to Byzantine attacks. Existing defense methods rely on strong assumptions, such as the proportion of malicious devices not exceeding 50%, or the server having an additional root dataset that matches the training task. Moreover, they show limited efficacy as they overlook (i) the divergence among benign updates and (ii) the curse of dimensionality involved in comparing two high-dimensional updates. To solve these concerns, we propose FL-OA, a Byzantine-robust federated learning framework utilizing outsourced auditing. In FL-OA, the server collaborates with third-party organization that holds an additional root dataset to perform outsourced auditing, thereby enabling the server to achieve robust aggregation without strong assumptions. Additionally, FL-OA introduces a gradient ascent step and a correction term during local training to mitigate the divergence among benign updates, and designs a parameter importance indicator to extract critical parameters for auditing, alleviating the curse of dimensionality. We further provide a detailed theoretical analysis of FL-OA. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FL-OA outperforms existing defense methods against Byzantine attacks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.
Builds on
27 of 55 references.
References · 27
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 906
- 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 766
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2021Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularizationcited by 562
- 2020A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospectscited by 397
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
- 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Surveycited by 346
- 2020Federated Learning of a Mixture of Global and Local Modelscited by 210
15 more
- 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 198
- 2022Towards Understanding Sharpness-Aware Minimizationcited by 146
- 2022Generalized Federated Learning via Sharpness Aware Minimizationcited by 144
- 2020Salvaging Federated Learning by Local Adaptationcited by 142
- 2022Penalizing Gradient Norm for Efficiently Improving Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 122
- 2016Resnet in Resnet: Generalizing Residual Architecturescited by 110
- 2023Federated Learning for Generalization, Robustness, Fairness: A Survey and Benchmarkcited by 99
- 2022Neurotoxin: Durable Backdoors in Federated Learningcited by 98
- 2020Free-rider Attacks on Model Aggregation in Federated Learningcited by 57
- 2022FedFA: Federated Learning with Feature Anchors to Align Features and Classifiers for Heterogeneous Datacited by 50
- 2023FedSpeed: Larger Local Interval, Less Communication Round, and Higher Generalization Accuracycited by 49
- 2023On the Vulnerability of Backdoor Defenses for Federated Learningcited by 27
- 2023Multi-metrics adaptively identifies backdoors in Federated learningcited by 23
- 2025Detecting Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning via Direction Alignment Inspectioncited by 13
- 2024Byzantine-Resilient Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning Without Privacy Compromisescited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.