mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Federated Learning Mitigates Client-side Training Data Distribution Inference Attacks

arXiv 2403.03149 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2024cs.CR cs.DC cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies have revealed that federated learning (FL), once considered secure due to clients not sharing their private data with the server, is vulnerable to attacks such as client-side training data distribution inference, where a malicious client can recreate the victim's data. While various countermeasures exist, they are not practical, often assuming server access to some training data or knowledge of label distribution before the attack. In this work, we bridge the gap by proposing InferGuard, a novel Byzantine-robust aggregation rule aimed at defending against client-side training data distribution inference attacks. In our proposed InferGuard, the server first calculates the coordinate-wise median of all the model updates it receives. A client's model update is considered malicious if it significantly deviates from the computed median update. We conduct a thorough evaluation of our proposed InferGuard on five benchmark datasets and perform a comparison with ten baseline methods. The results of our experiments indicate that our defense mechanism is highly effective in protecting against client-side training data distribution inference attacks, even against strong adaptive attacks. Furthermore, our method substantially outperforms the baseline methods in various practical FL scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2024.

Builds on

17 of 28 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  4. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  5. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
  6. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
  7. 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 561
  8. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
  9. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
  10. 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 326
  11. 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 324
  12. 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 285
5 more
  1. 2017Sparse Communication for Distributed Gradient Descentcited by 243
  2. 2019Byzantine-Robust Federated Machine Learning through Adaptive Model Averagingcited by 70
  3. 2021Gradient-Leakage Resilient Federated Learningcited by 40
  4. 2022Gradient Obfuscation Gives a False Sense of Security in Federated Learningcited by 37
  5. 2022AFLGuard: Byzantine-robust Asynchronous Federated Learningcited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

11 papers.