Robust Federated Learning Mitigates Client-side Training Data Distribution Inference Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent studies have revealed that federated learning (FL), once considered secure due to clients not sharing their private data with the server, is vulnerable to attacks such as client-side training data distribution inference, where a malicious client can recreate the victim's data. While various countermeasures exist, they are not practical, often assuming server access to some training data or knowledge of label distribution before the attack. In this work, we bridge the gap by proposing InferGuard, a novel Byzantine-robust aggregation rule aimed at defending against client-side training data distribution inference attacks. In our proposed InferGuard, the server first calculates the coordinate-wise median of all the model updates it receives. A client's model update is considered malicious if it significantly deviates from the computed median update. We conduct a thorough evaluation of our proposed InferGuard on five benchmark datasets and perform a comparison with ten baseline methods. The results of our experiments indicate that our defense mechanism is highly effective in protecting against client-side training data distribution inference attacks, even against strong adaptive attacks. Furthermore, our method substantially outperforms the baseline methods in various practical FL scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2024.
Builds on
17 of 28 references.
References · 17
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
- 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 561
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
- 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 326
- 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 324
- 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 285
5 more
- 2017Sparse Communication for Distributed Gradient Descentcited by 243
- 2019Byzantine-Robust Federated Machine Learning through Adaptive Model Averagingcited by 70
- 2021Gradient-Leakage Resilient Federated Learningcited by 40
- 2022Gradient Obfuscation Gives a False Sense of Security in Federated Learningcited by 37
- 2022AFLGuard: Byzantine-robust Asynchronous Federated Learningcited by 29
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2024Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 47
- 2025Do We Really Need to Design New Byzantine-robust Aggregation Rules?cited by 13
- 2024Poisoning Attacks on Federated Learning-based Wireless Traffic Predictioncited by 10
- 2024LoBAM: LoRA-Based Backdoor Attack on Model Mergingcited by 10
- 2025Securing Genomic Data Against Inference Attacks in Federated Learning Environmentscited by 1
- 2026Beyond Denial-of-Service: The Puppeteer's Attack for Fine-Grained Control in Ranking-Based Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2025Find a Scapegoat: Poisoning Membership Inference Attack and Defense to Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2025Who Owns This Sample: Cross-Client Membership Inference Attack in Federated Graph Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2025Multi-Hop Privacy Propagation for Differentially Private Federated Learning in Social Networkscited by 0
- 2026SecureAFL: Secure Asynchronous Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026Fair Finetuning Mitigates Distribution Inference Attackscited by 0
- 2026Fair Finetuning Mitigates Distribution Inference Attacks1 Jun 2026
- 2026SecureAFL: Secure Asynchronous Federated Learning4 Apr 2026
- 2026Beyond Denial-of-Service: The Puppeteer's Attack for Fine-Grained Control in Ranking-Based Federated Learning21 Jan 2026
- 2025Multi-Hop Privacy Propagation for Differentially Private Federated Learning in Social Networks11 Aug 2025
- 2025Who Owns This Sample: Cross-Client Membership Inference Attack in Federated Graph Neural Networks26 Jul 2025
- 2025Find a Scapegoat: Poisoning Membership Inference Attack and Defense to Federated Learning1 Jul 2025
- 2025Securing Genomic Data Against Inference Attacks in Federated Learning Environments12 May 2025
- 2025Do We Really Need to Design New Byzantine-robust Aggregation Rules?29 Jan 2025
- 2024LoBAM: LoRA-Based Backdoor Attack on Model Merging23 Nov 2024
- 2024Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated Learning14 Jun 2024
- 2024Poisoning Attacks on Federated Learning-based Wireless Traffic Prediction22 Apr 2024