When Clients Are Orchestrated: Strategic Gradient Manipulation to Defeat Federated Learning Servers with Efficient Defense
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning enables decentralized model training by exchanging model updates--rather than raw data--with a central parameter server (PS). While most of the existing defenses primarily assume static or independently acting adversaries, we reveal a new class of dynamically adaptive attacks that systematically bypass such protections. We propose Fed-ADR, a holistic attack framework in which a malicious orchestrator server (OS) dynamically coordinates a heterogeneous set of adversarial clients, including both targeted and untargeted attackers. Through real-time coordination by the OS, malicious clients strategically adapt their gradient updates to evade defenses deployed by the PS, while either severely degrading global model performance or steering training toward adversarial objectives.To mitigate this threat, we offer a detection mechanism that estimates each client's true gradient from historical updates, enabling real-time detection of coordinated malicious behavior without additional overhead. We further introduce an in-situ recovery mechanism that restores global model performance without restarting training, preserving convergence and minimizing recovery time. Comprehensive experiments on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CIFAR-10 benchmark datasets demonstrate that Fed-ADR's attack scheme can reduce global accuracy from over 90% to below 10%, bypassing several state-of-the-art defenses. When our detection and recovery modules are employed, they identify malicious clients and restore accuracy to over 90% within a few rounds, at a substantially lower cost than retraining from scratch--achieving a reduction of at least 20x in computational overhead.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2026.
Builds on
14 of 34 references.
References · 14
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 351
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 275
- 2018Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoningcited by 161
- 2020Intrinsic Certified Robustness of Bagging against Data Poisoning Attackscited by 94
- 2022FedRecover: Recovering from Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning using Historical Informationcited by 58
- 2020With Great Dispersion Comes Greater Resilience: Efficient Poisoning Attacks and Defenses for Linear Regression Modelscited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.