FedUP: Efficient Pruning-based Federated Unlearning for Model Poisoning Attacks
On the map: LLM safety and security → Federated unlearning and poisoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) can be vulnerable to attacks, such as model poisoning, where adversaries send malicious local weights to compromise the global model. Federated Unlearning (FU) is emerging as a solution to address such vulnerabilities by selectively removing the influence of detected malicious contributors on the global model without complete retraining. However, unlike typical FU scenarios where clients are trusted and cooperative, applying FU with malicious and possibly colluding clients is challenging because their collaboration in unlearning their data cannot be assumed. This work presents FedUP, a lightweight FU algorithm designed to efficiently mitigate malicious clients' influence by pruning specific connections within the attacked model. Our approach achieves efficiency by relying only on clients' weights from the last training round before unlearning to identify which connections to inhibit. Isolating malicious influence is non-trivial due to overlapping updates from benign and malicious clients. FedUP addresses this by carefully selecting and zeroing the highest magnitude weights that diverge the most between the latest updates from benign and malicious clients while preserving benign information. FedUP is evaluated under a strong adversarial threat model, where up to 50%-1 of the clients could be malicious and have full knowledge of the aggregation process. We demonstrate the effectiveness, robustness, and efficiency of our solution through experiments across IID and Non-IID data, under label-flipping and backdoor attacks, and by comparing it with state-of-the-art (SOTA) FU solutions. In all scenarios, FedUP reduces malicious influence, lowering accuracy on malicious data to match that of a model retrained from scratch while preserving performance on benign data. FedUP achieves effective unlearning while consistently being faster and saving storage compared to the SOTA.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 30 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2025.
Builds on
30 of 57 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025NoT: Federated Unlearning via Weight Negation7 Mar
- 2025FedMUA: Exploring the Vulnerabilities of Federated Learning to Malicious Unlearning Attacks21 Jan
- 2024Federated Unlearning: A Survey on Methods, Design Guidelines, and Evaluation Metrics10 Jan
- 2022VeriFi: Towards Verifiable Federated Unlearning25 May
- 2022Federated Unlearning with Knowledge Distillation24 Jan
- 2021Federated Unlearning via Class-Discriminative Pruning22 Oct
Other references · 24
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
- 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 599
- 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 583
- 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 541
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
- 2018Soft Filter Pruning for Accelerating Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 315
12 more
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 275
- 2017NISP: Pruning Networks using Neuron Importance Score Propagationcited by 228
- 2023Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine Unlearningcited by 214
- 2022FLDetector: Defending Federated Learning Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Detecting Malicious Clientscited by 125
- 2023Federated Learning for Generalization, Robustness, Fairness: A Survey and Benchmarkcited by 99
- 2020Learning to Detect Malicious Clients for Robust Federated Learningcited by 88
- 2021Provably Secure Federated Learning against Malicious Clientscited by 63
- 2022FedRecover: Recovering from Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning using Historical Informationcited by 58
- 2019Abnormal Client Behavior Detection in Federated Learningcited by 40
- 2020Federated Generalized Bayesian Learning via Distributed Stein Variational Gradient Descentcited by 35
- 2022FL-Defender: Combating Targeted Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 15
- 2020Softer Pruning, Incremental Regularizationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Adversarial Update-Based Federated Unlearning for Poisoned Model Recovery
- 2025Poisoning Attacks and Defenses to Federated Unlearning
- 2024Mitigating Malicious Attacks in Federated Learning via Confidence-aware Defense
- 2023FreqFed: A Frequency Analysis-Based Approach for Mitigating Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning
- 2025BadFU: Backdoor Federated Learning through Adversarial Machine Unlearning
- 2022FedCC: Robust Federated Learning against Model Poisoning Attacks
- 2025SoK: Benchmarking Poisoning Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning
- 2025A Client-level Assessment of Collaborative Backdoor Poisoning in Non-IID Federated Learning