SCRUB-FL: Sanitizing and Cleansing Representations via Unlearning of Backdoors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training without sharing raw data, making it a promising paradigm for privacy-sensitive applications. However, its decentralized nature makes it inherently vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where malicious clients embed hidden triggers into local training data to manipulate model predictions. Existing defenses mainly operate during before and during aggregation cannot fully eliminate backdoor behaviors that persist in the converged global model. Moreover, the effectiveness of post-training sanitization is often limited by the server's lack of knowledge of trigger patterns or poisoned clients after convergence, resulting in residual backdoor behaviors or accuracy degradation due to neuron entanglement. To address this limitation, we propose SCRUB-FL (Sanitizing and Cleansing Representations via Unlearning of Backdoors), a two-phase solution for post-training backdoor removal in FL. During training, clients identify suspicious samples using spectral analysis and activation clustering, then train lightweight Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP) models to capture trigger-related distributions. The generator parameters are aggregated server-side to construct a global representation of suspicious patterns without exposing raw data. After convergence, the server synthesizes trigger-approximating samples and applies machine unlearning to erase the trigger-target association by redistributing predictions toward a uniform distribution. Experimental evaluations on CIFAR-10 and GTSRB across three attack types and up to 40% malicious participation demonstrate that SCRUB-FL reduces the backdoor attack success rate to as low as 3.88% while maintaining over 91% normal task accuracy, outperforming state-of-the-art defenses without requiring prior trigger knowledge or a large clean proxy dataset at the server.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2026.
Builds on
9 of 24 references.
References · 9
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,235
- 2018Fine-Pruning: Defending Against Backdooring Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 580
- 2018Detecting Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks by Activation Clusteringcited by 456
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
- 2022MUDGUARD: Taming Malicious Majorities in Federated Learning using Privacy-Preserving Byzantine-Robust Clusteringcited by 5
- 2024Securing Federated Learning against Backdoor Threats with Foundation Model Integrationcited by 3
- 2025Robust Knowledge Distillation in Federated Learning: Counteracting Backdoor Attackscited by 2
- 2025Defending the Edge: Representative-Attention Defense against Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025BadFU: Backdoor Federated Learning through Adversarial Machine Unlearning
- 2024DeTrigger: A Gradient-Centric Approach to Backdoor Attack Mitigation in Federated Learning
- 2023Get Rid Of Your Trail: Remotely Erasing Backdoors in Federated Learning
- 2024FLAIN: Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning via Flipping Weight Updates of Low-Activation Input Neurons
- 2025FedBAP: Backdoor Defense via Benign Adversarial Perturbation in Federated Learning
- 2024Harmless Backdoor-based Client-side Watermarking in Federated Learning
- 2022Sniper Backdoor: Single Client Targeted Backdoor Attack in Federated Learning
- 2022PerDoor: Persistent Non-Uniform Backdoors in Federated Learning using Adversarial Perturbations